The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1997

Diecast Collector Forums

Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.

8Forums
195,000+Topics
1,276,000+Posts
10,000+Members
1997Research From

MCG Lincoln Mark V ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

MCG Lincoln Mark V proportions

6 Posts
4 Users
12 Reactions
2,064 Views
(@carcass1996)
Honorable Member
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 285
Topic starter  

Hello,

 

for those who have seen and maybe owned Lincoln Mark V - is that correct for the nose to taper to the front (when looking from above)?

For the comparison - BoS' Mark V nose is straight as a woodplank. The same goes for trunk, it is more narrow than the BoS' version.

But they have the same width (more or less) around the waist.

P.S. BoS is the golden one, MCG is closer to bronze.

IMG 20220520 225618
IMG 20220520 232553
IMG 20220520 225529
IMG 20220520 225652
IMG 20220520 225514


   
Steve Jacobs, John Kuvakas, Steve Jacobs and 1 people reacted
Quote
(@carcass1996)
Honorable Member
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 285
Topic starter  

to illustrate my point - the line next to BoS Mark is STRAIGHT, the line next to MCG Mark is CURVING toward both bumpers

IMG 20220520 225529 lines

 



   
ReplyQuote
Rich Sufficool
(@rich-sufficool)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 17582
 

I owned a MkV for about 15 years and I also own the BoS model (as well as a 1/24 and a 1/43). I would swear that the body doesn't taper like the MCG. Of course the car no longer sits in my driveway for verification.

MkV 002
MkV 003

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 23643
 

Well.....    Most cars "taper" at both ends; it's difficult to notice unless you have an overhead or "bird's eye view." I've owned a few Lincolns but never a 1977-79 Mark V. Of course any "normal views" (non-overhead pics) of these Lincolns all seem to indicate yard-stick lines, no taper but again, it's all quite deceiving.

Bottom line: I can't help you; I do not have the answer... I'm sorry.

Anyone else?

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@carcass1996)
Honorable Member
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 285
Topic starter  

Rich, Chris, I kinda expected this but thank you anyway ) I remain of the opinion that the original car sides were not flat but had slight curvature toward both ends (as you can see on the attached photo if you look at the side insert). As to the model, I prefer MCG version over BoS and I'm keeping all three colors. It is more correct than BoS in many aspects (turn lights, radiator grill, side curvature and overall proportions, even though it has incorrectly chromed out front bumper filler).

full

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@bob-jackman)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 27166
 

I don't have the MCG model so I can't respond to which model is best. I do have the BOS and compared it to my 1/1 many times and thought it was perfect. I sold my 1/1 three weeks ago because of space limitations...some regrets.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: