(Pics) 1966 Oldsmob...
 
Notifications
Clear all

(Pics) 1966 Oldsmobile 442

33 Posts
6 Users
61 Reactions
3,650 Views
(@Anonymous 197205242)
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 5402
Topic starter  

This is Highway 61's fine version of the 1966 Oldsmobile 442. They, of course, also did a superb 1967 edition of the Oldsmobile 442. I am very lucky to have both years 1/18ths of this classic American muscle car.

Photo Series 9 4 20 001mod2XCZ
Photo Series 9 4 20 009mod3XCZ
Photo Series 9 4 20 006mod2XCZ
3249259161 f7e2875130 o
Photo Series 9 4 20 003mod2XCZ
4939826627 cb74066db1 o
Photo Series 2 7 07 020v2
Photo Series 10 21 07 003mod2BZCv2
Photo Series 2 7 07 034mod1BZCv2

 

 



   
Marty Johnson, john barry, George Schire and 6 people reacted
Quote
(@bob-jackman)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 15553
 

Love the pictures Mike.



   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10638
 

A very nice Oldsmobile model. HW61 had no apprehensions about replicating vinyl tops, which was a good thing. Not too many other 1/18 manufactures were willing to work with "vinyl."



   
Steve Jacobs reacted
ReplyQuote
Charles Rockett
(@charles-rockett)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 2381
 
Posted by: @chris

A very nice Oldsmobile model. HW61 had no apprehensions about replicating vinyl tops, which was a good thing. Not too many other 1/18 manufactures were willing to work with "vinyl."

Is it not simply a textured paint application?



   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10638
 

@charles-rockett No, it is (that's why "vinyl" was in quotes ) but HW61 seem to do it better (and more often ) than most. A nice touch appreciated by most collectors, I'm sure, because vinyl tops were a popular option in the mid-'60's - early 1980's.

VT  3
VT 2
VT 1


   
ReplyQuote
Charles Rockett
(@charles-rockett)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 2381
 

@chris I understood the quotation brackets, but some of these larger scale producers do use different materials and thus I wondered why some manufacturers would avoid what seems on the face of it, a simple procedure. Perhaps it's the level of texture in the paint that is at issue?



   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10638
 

@charles-rockett Right. Good question...and I don't have an answer other than to assume it was all about cost/profit.  HW61 made excellent use of tooling, offering multiple years of the same car by simply changing trim/badging and vinyl top options. I suspect their ability to spread out vinyl top  costs was an advantage lesser manufacturers didn't enjoy.



   
ReplyQuote
Charles Rockett
(@charles-rockett)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 2381
 

@chris That makes sense. In my industry we maximise on every possible variation of initial sample possible. But that depends upon a market able to 'soak-up' such saturation - to use a simile.  

I once painted the roof of a silver 1969 Ford Capri in matte black to achieve a vinyl roof and even that was too thick for it to look in scale - goes to show.



   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10638
 
Posted by: @charles-rockett

I once painted the roof of a silver 1969 Ford Capri in matte black to achieve a vinyl roof and even that was too thick

Wow!  Paint was too thick?  

I used to simulate very accurate looking, in-scale, vinyl tops (with seems & everything ) using thin but wide masking tape. The textured tape could then be painted any color, but of course, black  or white  were most often chosen. If I have pics, I'll post them.



   
ReplyQuote
Charles Rockett
(@charles-rockett)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 2381
 

@chris I would be interested, as all these techniques are useful to know about.  I should've pointed-out that my silver Capri was 1/43 not 18 as in this forum, and had it been sprayed it would' have looked ok. But I used a brush, and whilst it was flat and even - no brush strokes - it did kinda' look as if it was wearing a toupee!  (Maybe that's just because I knew it was).



   
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 8215
 
Posted by: @chris

A very nice Oldsmobile model. HW61 had no apprehensions about replicating vinyl tops, which was a good thing. Not too many other 1/18 manufactures were willing to work with "vinyl."

But all the manufacturers had no problems working with my 'bank account' 🤑



   
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 8215
 

I like both years but I prefer the '67 because of the separated headlights. I just think it's a better looking front design.



   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 197205242)
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 5402
Topic starter  

I like both years Oldsmobile 442 which is why I also have both years muscle cars ! They are a great looking car and diecast.



   
ReplyQuote
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 7280
 

Great photos!  Great model!  One I'd have added back in the day.  One question, why the stupid rear window?  It's a hardtop, wind the windows down!


George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
Steve Jacobs reacted
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 197205242)
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 5402
Topic starter  

Thanks, all ! I think, like in certain cases, H61 kind of "split the difference" between windows all up and windows all down, and did it this way in their 1966, as opposed to their 1967 442, with a completely windows down look and then also available as a 1967 convertible.

I believe, like with some other diecast cars, a Dremel can quickly and completely remove the side window for a '66 all-down look, should one prefer that look. 



   
ReplyQuote
Page 1 / 3
Share: