The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1997

Diecast Collector Forums

Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.

8Forums
195,000+Topics
1,276,000+Posts
10,000+Members
1997Research From

PICs - Daily Dose o...
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] PICs - Daily Dose of Diecast...Wednesday

17 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
6 Views
John Merritt
(@jcarnutz)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 18674
Topic starter  

PICs - Daily Dose of Diecast...Wednesday 1971 Lincoln Continental Mark III Hardtop
-issued by Automodello in 2015
-a Limited Edition of 171, mine is #11
-finished in Ginger Bronze Moondust


John Merritt
South Lyon, Michigan - USA


   
(@Jerry Gorsuch)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

Beautiful model and your pics make it look real but, too costly for me.



   
(@phil-r)
Reputable Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 159
 

I agree Jerry these Automodello Mark llls are very photogenic and even look realistic live!

I have all 3 versions and intend on repainting a couple down the road!!



   
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 7280
 

Had it and returned it. Just could NOT justify the cost. And the window up on the riders side was not for me. Don't get me wrong, it's a great looking and produced model, but the price is simply out of my comfort zone. I doubt I'm not alone on that thought either. It's for sure going to have a very small and selective market.


George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
John Napoli
(@carsman1958)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 4587
 

I would have loved one of these in this color as my Mom drove a 1970 in the exact color. But like the rest, too expensive for me. I do like that the window is up on one side and not on the other. I am sure they did this so you could display it so that you could really see into the interior and be able to display showing what it would look like with the window. Beautiful rendition, and wish it was more in line with our regular diecast models.



   
(@Randy Portwood)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

All three editions are gorgeous but this is my fave!



   
(@Gene Mills)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

A beauty but the NEO 1949 Caddy is as well done and more reasonably priced.



   
(@Al Dorado)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

I luv those Neo '49 Caddys. I have both the 1:24 and 1:18.



   
(@Sal Lomma)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

Have this one and the red one. Gorgeous cars.



   
(@Dennis Mong)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

I wish I had this one - John, Your pics are Root Beer Looking delicious !!!



   
(@phil-r)
Reputable Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 159
 

George it doesn't need any market at this point as im 99% sure all colors/versions are sold out!!!



   
Rich Sufficool
(@rich-sufficool)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 17566
 

Pics look great. That's a tough color to photograph. You nailed it!



   
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 7280
 

It's still a small market Phil. For every collector that wanted or could afford those cars, there dozens who wouldn't pay the excessive price and a many who just can't afford it.

Any way you slice it, that shrinks the market.


George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
(@phil-r)
Reputable Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 159
 

Well 1:24 diecast in itself is a small / niche market !! Add in the mix. Resin models costing 2-3 xs

What diecast models cost and the market/audience definitely will be smaller for sure! You do have a point in a way.



   
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 7280
 

A sad fact is that it's a damn shame that America can't produce a 1:24 car the quality of

Danbury Mint and Franklin Mint in their heyday for an affordable price.

I remember when DM was putting out models on a regular basis, folks were saying that if they were produced in the U.S. we'd be paying three and four times the amount we were paying for them to produced in China.

That's simply a problem that shouldn't be a problem.


George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
Page 1 / 2
Share: