I thought Stamp alr...
 
Notifications
Clear all

I thought Stamp already did '59s

16 Posts
7 Users
52 Reactions
3,061 Views
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10375
Topic starter  

I thought Stamp already did 1959 Cadillacs in 1/43.....   guess not.  This prototype looks pretty good so far.  I do not know when these will be available.

S 1
S 2
S 3


   
David Green, John Merritt, Steve Jacobs and 3 people reacted
Quote
(@whodeytink)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1519
 

I'm sure they will do a knock out job with them but I've got plenty of 59s.



   
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 21287
 

I am definitely not a fan of the '59 Caddy design but I definitely will buy this one (a)  because it is an iconic 50s fins era car and (b) because it is a STAMP product.



   
David Green, John Merritt, John Kuvakas and 2 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7872
 

Well then obviously Jack you must be giving it your 

'stamp' of approval. 👍



   
John Merritt, Jack Dodds, John Kuvakas and 1 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10375
Topic starter  

@jack-dodds I often hear that.... love it/hate it, it's too iconic to overlook.



   
John Merritt, Ed Davis, John Kuvakas and 1 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7872
 

Chris,

Are you getting the Stamp 1/18 ?



   
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 21287
 
Posted by: @chris

@jack-dodds I often hear that.... love it/hate it, it's too iconic to overlook.

I have most of the post war thru 1973 Cadillacs in 1:43 (mostly Stamp), so to exclude the most polarizing and yet iconic design of that time frame would be a glaring omission in my display.



   
Steve Jacobs, Ed Davis, John Merritt and 2 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10375
Topic starter  

@100ford2003 The short answer is "No,"   although I should've bought at least a few as investments, right? In 2024 & 25 they'll be $650 plus! 

But as a model, I just can't bring myself to spend ANY money for a sealed resin replica despite HOW GORGEOUS these 1/18 '59s are. I must admit, though, that Stamp's 1959 CDV and upcoming 1962 SDV have tempted me more than any other 1/18 resin.



   
ReplyQuote
John Merritt
(@jcarnutz)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 5496
 

The ‘59 in 1:43 is a must have for me. I live the design. I’m hoping for interesting colors other than red.

I've been very tempted by 1:18 Stamp models too. So hard to resist, but I stopped collecting that scale, so far that’s my excuse for not buying.


John Merritt
South Lyon, Michigan - USA


   
Steve Jacobs, Jack Dodds, John Kuvakas and 1 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@bob-jackman)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 15106
 

@jack-dodds I agree Jack I think you share my thinking that the 62 is my favorite post war Cadillac. Several years ago Conquest did the 62 in a Coupe DeVille, Sedan DeVille and a convertible. IMO these Conquest models are superb and equal to the best MOC models in detail and proportions.



   
John Kuvakas, Steve Jacobs, Ed Davis and 2 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 21287
 
Posted by: @jcarnutz

The ‘59 in 1:43 is a must have for me. I live the design. I’m hoping for interesting colors other than red.

I've been very tempted by 1:18 Stamp models too. So hard to resist, but I stopped collecting that scale, so far that’s my excuse for not buying.

I agree about wanting more/better colors on this CDV.  My personal 4 best likes in order are Persian Sand Poly, Wood Rose Poly,  Inverness Green Poly with white roof. Georgian Blue Poly.

image


   
ReplyQuote
John Merritt
(@jcarnutz)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 5496
 

@jack-dodds 

All great colors, I'd go for any of them.


John Merritt
South Lyon, Michigan - USA


   
John Kuvakas reacted
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7872
 
Posted by: @jack-dodds
Posted by: @jcarnutz

The ‘59 in 1:43 is a must have for me. I live the design. I’m hoping for interesting colors other than red.

I've been very tempted by 1:18 Stamp models too. So hard to resist, but I stopped collecting that scale, so far that’s my excuse for not buying.

I agree about wanting more/better colors on this CDV.  My personal 4 best likes in order are Persian Sand Poly, Wood Rose Poly,  Inverness Green Poly with white roof. Georgian Blue Poly.

image

Beautiful choices.



   
John Kuvakas reacted
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7872
 
Posted by: @chris

@100ford2003 The short answer is "No,"   although I should've bought at least a few as investments, right? In 2024 & 25 they'll be $650 plus! 

But as a model, I just can't bring myself to spend ANY money for a sealed resin replica despite HOW GORGEOUS these 1/18 '59s are. I must admit, though, that Stamp's 1959 CDV and upcoming 1962 SDV have tempted me more than any other 1/18 resin.

I'm not a big fan of the '59 Cadillac. I love every other GM product for '59 but not the Cadillac. However, if I had the money, I would buy one  just to have it because it looks perfect. 

IMO, Sunstar hit H.R.s with their '59 Pontiacs and Oldsmobiles. I wish they'd have attempted the Caddy. At least we were lucky enough to get the Chevy and Buick which were / are decent models. I'm not impressed with the AutoArt Caddy.

Steve 

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10375
Topic starter  
Posted by: @100ford2003

I'm not impressed with the AutoArt Caddy.

Steve 

I'm surprised to hear that. Having owned a 1:1 '59 CDV, I can say the AA '59 is very good but NOT without flaws. The brown color was pure fiction, but the Seminole Red was accurate. The trunk is all wrong (the black paint under the trunk is ridiculous ). There's no antenna & engine detail is minimal....but it's still the best 1/18 1959 Cadillac around.

C 59 7

 



   
ReplyQuote
Page 1 / 2
Share: