How do you define the difference between a toy and a model?

Posted by: @marty-johnson

↑

We've all heard it, right?  Someone will refer to our models as a "toy car collection."  I always correct them.  However, where do you think is the point of demarcation that a model car does not qualify as a toy car? 

There may not be a definitive line of demarcation to separate a toy's description from that of a model, because there are too many bleed-over's involved. There are special toys that command thousands of dollars and there are cheap models that are valueless. Generally speaking, a toy is something that a child would typically play with where no thought is given to the result of breakage. A model is a smaller scale rendition of something else. Add plenty of detail to it and operational parts and rising price tags then preclude playtime because of expected bad results thereof.

Ertl, who build most of my tractor collection, puts age-appropriate numbers on some of their products. There's 3+ then 8 and over and 14 and over. They also mark some for adult collections. The predominance of mine fit the last category. They even mark the less expensive ones for 'play'.

So Tony, given your comprehensive explanations, which ones do you get down on the floor and play with?

Posted by: @bob-jackman

↑

So Tony, given your comprehensive explanations, which ones do you get down on the floor and play with?

HA! None; too much trouble getting back up!!   

I think you guys have about covered it - clearly in scales like 1:18 they are not things to play with. I have to admit that one of the reasons why all of my models on display have identification placards is to let people clearly know that the models are representations of real cars with real histories.

I find that by identifying them people understand that they are not toys but a serious model collection - If asked, I'll also tell them what they are insured for - that generally ends the 'toy' conversation 

Maybe just call them replicas.