The Black... Hornet...
 
Notifications
Clear all

The Black... Hornet... [PIC]

13 Posts
5 Users
42 Reactions
337 Views
Rich Sufficool
(@rich-sufficool)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 4912
Topic starter  

I always loved the 1966 Chrysler Imperial Crown Coupe. Just 10 years ago, there was a beautiful black coupe sitting in a gas station that I eyed every day, but just wasn't in a position to pursue it at the time. Well the best I could do was buy this Dean Jeffries "Black Beauty" hardtop sedan from the the Green Hornet TV series of that year. It seems like AUTOart bit off more than they could chew with this model. The Black beauty was built with Jeffries given "money is no object" license. All the majors were bidding to have their luxury car used in the series and Chrysler won because they just dropped off a free Imperial sedan at the studio. Unlike the low budget Batmobile conversion, Jeffries added a thousand pounds of gizmos and gadgets that made the Batmobile look like basic transportation. There were so many panels that revealed various weaponry. The single headlamps flipped to reveal quad "infragreen" headlights. Being way ahead of its time, Jefferies had the trunk lid panels open to launch a drone equipped with a TV camera (looking suspiciously like a lawn sprinkler). Autoart had to make decisions on how far they wanted to go to reveal all this hidden technology. Well, the first to go was the water-cooled fender mounted twin 50 cal. machine guns. All the rocket pods were modeled open, the sleeping gas nozzle was also modeled as deployed, and the small grill  panels  between the lamps and grill are closed. The drone is also in position for deployment. They basically couldn't afford all the finger fun possible and keep the pricepoint reasonable. Also modeled as deploy are the brushes used to obscure the car's tire tracks. Yes, there were just too many gadgets and gizmos on the Black Beauty to make functional. Dean Jeffries charged a whopping $50,000 for his work when the stock Imperial was 'just' $5733 new. The model's interior is nicely done and mostly stock and the engine bay with the Imperial's 440 cid is beautifully rendered with just a few doodads added there. Although most of the weaponry shown is well done, I just wish I could have the option to close all the panels just to enjoy the uninterrupted design of the stock car.

Black Beauty 009 001
Black Beauty 008 001
Black Beauty 002 001
1 Black Beauty 033 001
Black Beauty 003
Black Beauty 017 001
Black Beauty 020 001
Black Beauty 013 001
Black Beauty 014
Black Beauty 012
Black Beauty 011
Black Beauty 037
Black Beauty 030 001
1 Black Beauty 018
Black Beauty 036
Black Beauty 031
Black Beauty 005
Black Beauty 004
Black Beauty 027 001
black beauty and batmobile 001

 



   
Quote
Marty Johnson
(@marty-johnson)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1685
 

This weekend, I saw on FB where a modeler modified the AUTOart Black Beauty and made all of the gizmo door panels operable.  I should have snapped photos because I have no clue who posted it.  However, if I see 'em again, I'll be sure to save 'em and post here.  

That said, I absolutely love this model.  The Black Beauty AND the Barris Batmobile were high on my model car wish list.  When they were produced, acquiring both of them scratched my 1:18 scale itch for these cars.  It displays well with my Batmobile, which I also am enthralled with.  

DSC01529
DSC00689


   
ReplyQuote
(@michaeldetorrice)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2152
 

A great write-up outlining the scale model and the history of the "Green Hornet" gadget-filled transportation vehicle ! When I was a kid, I built a scale plastic model of this year Imperial.



   
ReplyQuote
Paul Rouffa
(@paul-rouffa)
Famed Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 1160
 

Not to mention the power of its V194!



   
ReplyQuote
Rich Sufficool
(@rich-sufficool)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 4912
Topic starter  

@paul-rouffa That "V194" seems to be quite a mystery as to does it have some meaning or not.



   
ReplyQuote
Marty Johnson
(@marty-johnson)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1685
 

@ Rich Sufficool - I found the modified AUTOart Black Beauty with the operating features.  

Black Beauty Modified 1
Black Beauty Modified 2
Black Beauty Modified 3
Black Beauty Modified 4
Black Beauty Modified 5
Black Beauty Modified 6


   
John Merritt, Steve Jacobs, Tony Perrone and 2 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10339
 

@marty-johnson These mods are right up my alley; this sure seems like something I would do!  😉 😉 😉 

To be clear:  Autoart's  GH Imperial has "fixed"  gadgets, but this version has "hide-away gadgets,"  correct?    

Q: This is an Autoart  prototype or a collector owned but modified (by him ) version?

- The workmanship is very good!   😎 😎 😎 

PS

....I'm sorry, but...um....   I'd have to cut that trunk out!   😏 😏 😏 



   
ReplyQuote
Marty Johnson
(@marty-johnson)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1685
 

@chris - I don't believe AUTOart has two versions, and I'm pretty certain this is the only one.  The guy did the modifications himself.  And yes, this is right up your alley, and there is no way you could tolerate a closed trunk!  

I accidentally omitted a photo of the interior of the car.  The modeler included a "computer" control in the rear seat.  

600315823 122112389073111432 290354229578597233 n


   
ReplyQuote
Marty Johnson
(@marty-johnson)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1685
 

@chris - I tried to post a link but got an error message saying the post isn't available.  Weird because I'm looking at it now.  At any rate, I just did a screenshot of his text so you can see his description of how he accomplished the modifications.  

image


   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10339
 

@marty-johnson That is truly AWESOME; he does really nice work!    I love it when good models can be made better by a bit of ingenuity & elbow grease!   As you may know, I'm hacking out, yet another trunk, on a 1/18 1969 Charger NASACR (posted in the in the Handicrafts section ).....still a long way to go yet.

PG 6
PG 9
PG 10
PG 23
PG 24
PG 28
PG 42


   
ReplyQuote
Rich Sufficool
(@rich-sufficool)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 4912
Topic starter  

@marty-johnson Sunnuva B**ch!!! I hope AUTOart didn't screw me and some intrepid modeler actually made this. I suppose if Aa retooled the original, it'd probably add at least another C-note to the MSRP.... and I probably would have paid the freight.



   
ReplyQuote
Marty Johnson
(@marty-johnson)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1685
 

@chris - Yes, I am aware of your latest project and have been following.  It's coming along quite nicely.



   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10339
 

@marty-johnson Sorry....   sometimes I forget who knows what.    🙄 🙄 

Allow me to bore you - and anyone else - further:

Knowing virtually nothing about vintage racing - other than how cool the cars look - I've discovered that this Ertl 1/18 1969 Paul Goldsmith  Charger is actually a model of Charger prototype DC-93.  With its flush nose and rear window this car was the test bed for the winged-Chargers that followed.

In fact, this particular car was only raced a few times in early 1969 before it crashed and was returned to Dodge who then rebuilt it as a winged car.   It has a fascinating history, well known among NASCAR  fans.

LSS:

- Needless to say, Ertl did a terrible job replicating the actual DC-93;  it's fraught with inaccuracies.    So.... I'm trying to learn/correct all I can.  🙄 🙄 😯 😯 

PG 51
PG 50

The car only raced a few months in 1969 - so there's NOT a lot of info/detail about it.

PG 5
PG 46
PG 44
PG 47

Then it crashed and was rebuilt as a true winged car.

PG 52

Which was later re-skinned with a 1971 Charger body and raced until 1973, then abandoned w/the original nose piece close by.

PG 48
PG 53

It was then discovered 20 years ago and restored back to its original winged form (after it was Paul Goldsmith's #99 prototype DC-93 )

PG 54
PG 57
PG 55
PG 56
PG 49
PG 58

GOT ALL THAT?    NOW YOU KNOW HOW I FEEL !!!  😬 😬 😬 



   
ReplyQuote
Share: