The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1997

Diecast Collector Forums

Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.

8Forums
195,000+Topics
1,276,000+Posts
10,000+Members
1997Research From

#167 *I'VE GOT MAIL...
 
Notifications
Clear all

#167 *I'VE GOT MAIL* Late Edition 5-24-2021

7 Posts
5 Users
10 Reactions
2,131 Views
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 24696
Topic starter  

SORRY for the late "I'VE GOT MAIL" for today.  Life sort of got in the way this morning with various errands.  But alas, you can put the Back Seat down in this "Top -of-Line" Wagon for 1957 and relax while watching the stars in the park.  I was very excited when this Brochure came, as it rounded the "Tri-Chey" Nomad's in vibrant MATADOR RED. 

Danbury Mint presents "the coolest wagon on the road!  The 1957 CHEVROLET NOMAD!

DM 57 CHEVY NOMAD #1
DM 57 CHEVY NOMAD #2

George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
John Shamblin, Bob Jackman, Galen55 and 5 people reacted
Quote
(@perrone1)
Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 25218
 

Excellent!



   
ReplyQuote
John Napoli
(@carsman1958)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 4614
 

George, the Nomads, I think were better than their sibling sedans.  I have quite a few of the different years.



   
ReplyQuote
(@bob-jackman)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 27175
 

George, I too was glad when this came out to round out the tri five Nomads. I still have a problem with the top immediately over the windshield as it appears too rounded to me....other than that, the model is superb.



   
ReplyQuote
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 24696
Topic starter  
Posted by: @bob-jackman

George, I too was glad when this came out to round out the tri five Nomads. I still have a problem with the top immediately over the windshield as it appears too rounded to me....other than that, the model is superb.

I agree with you Bob.  Just a guess, but perhaps the problem was that they used the "convertible" body and the doors on the Nomad were slightly higher than they anticipated, thus forcing the "rounding" of the top.  But as you said, "other than that, the model is superb".  

The thing that really bothers me is that, Danbury's '55 Nomad and their '57 Nomad are 1:24 scale, while Franklin's '56 Nomad when displayed next to Danbury's, is BIGGER.  I've always believed that Franklin's was NOT 1:24 scale.  


George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
ReplyQuote
John Shamblin
(@shambles)
Famed Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 2869
 
Posted by: @georgeschire
Posted by: @bob-jackman

George, I too was glad when this came out to round out the tri five Nomads. I still have a problem with the top immediately over the windshield as it appears too rounded to me....other than that, the model is superb.

I agree with you Bob.  Just a guess, but perhaps the problem was that they used the "convertible" body and the doors on the Nomad were slightly higher than they anticipated, thus forcing the "rounding" of the top.  But as you said, "other than that, the model is superb".  

The thing that really bothers me is that, Danbury's '55 Nomad and their '57 Nomad are 1:24 scale, while Franklin's '56 Nomad when displayed next to Danbury's, is BIGGER.  I've always believed that Franklin's was NOT 1:24 scale.  

A while back, I posted something about the FM looking larger than 1:24. I'd never noticed it until I had it side-by-side with the DM '55 and '57.

smallNomads

 



   
ReplyQuote
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 24696
Topic starter  
Posted by: @john-shamblin
Posted by: @georgeschire
Posted by: @bob-jackman

George, I too was glad when this came out to round out the tri five Nomads. I still have a problem with the top immediately over the windshield as it appears too rounded to me....other than that, the model is superb.

I agree with you Bob.  Just a guess, but perhaps the problem was that they used the "convertible" body and the doors on the Nomad were slightly higher than they anticipated, thus forcing the "rounding" of the top.  But as you said, "other than that, the model is superb".  

The thing that really bothers me is that, Danbury's '55 Nomad and their '57 Nomad are 1:24 scale, while Franklin's '56 Nomad when displayed next to Danbury's, is BIGGER.  I've always believed that Franklin's was NOT 1:24 scale.  

A while back, I posted something about the FM looking larger than 1:24. I'd never noticed it until I had it side-by-side with the DM '55 and '57.

smallNomads

 

THANK YOU!  Your "side-by-side" photos prove that Franklin's model is BIGGER!  


George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
ReplyQuote
Share: