[Closed] New GLM Cadillacs

At first glance, the '60 Brougham looks to have too much sag in the rear quarters, the '62 S75 appears to have side windows that are too tall, and the '51 S75 has a few issues too. My other Cadillac friends can jump in right here...

Cadillac impressions...

The least exciting (to me) is the 1951 Seventy-Five, but it is also the least problem plagued in my eyes. I see nothing to prevent a potential purchase with it. The Eldorado Brougham was the one I had looked most forward to but the pics don't look good. It has no indication of a division between front and rear door glass and definite droopy rear syndrome. Same quarter panel issues look present on the 1962 also. And what is that ridiculously reverse tapered silver thing hanging off the back bumper of the 1962?

As always we can hope production examples will be improved from these photos.

Pre production prototypes...

It's unclear what the point in posting crude early representations are, anyways..

Also announced is a gorgeous Rolls Royce New Phantom

Transformable Phaeton by Hibbard & Darrin 1929, ex Marlene Dietrich.

Well, Robert, I thought someone would point out that it may be a a "pre-production" model. That is always everyone's excuse when these pics come out, then the model is just as bad. The fact is even if it is a pre-production test shot, they will not make another mold to correct something like windows being too tall. Droopy bodies were evident on several previous test shots of other manufacturers models, and they were issued with the "droop" in the rear quarters...and collectors continue to buy them, I don't.

Completely right, Lloyd.

Cynicism!...

....My point is that regardless of what they may or may not do with the production models, a pre production photo seems fairly worthless (at best)..although it is raw meat for the cynics.

Since we're specifically talking about GLM prototypes, I am unaware of any of the cars I've gotten (at least) that are grossly distorted. I do not doubt that other manufacturers might not take the time to correct errors, but it seems both unfair and unnecessarily harsh to generalize that onto GLM. At the very least, pre production pics are an opportunity to offer constructive feedback. Let's hope that at least GLM might actually respond favorably to that. If the recently introduced Packard 734 is any indication, they seem quite focused on authenticity and detail.

Yes, The ex Dietrich got lost here, you are right!

...I just hope GLM offers the car with a removable top...it's such an integral part of the design (actually patented!)..and oh-so- Dutch...

Lloyd, it's not a sag on the Brom, it's the visual effect of an incorrectly applied chrome adhesive on the lower body fin that create a dropping curve.
It's pretty clear from the 3/4 rear view.
photo no longer available

I am a bit concern about the "thickness" of the front bumper...
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
Otherwise, I love it !

For other "first" feelings, see my post #22800.4

😉

Not one to get into online fights with strangers, me...

....I'm commenting not on the actual concerns, but rather on the tone, which your post seems to confirm. Good job?

Robert,

With all due respect, no matter the way you take my tone, which is something that only belongs to you, I am still waiting your "opportunity to offer constructive feedback" about these Cadillacs.

I honestly really do. I'd love to hear it. Cause if you say you're not commenting on real model concerns, why are you ?

If it's your desire to comment only after an official model release, which is perfect too, please respect others who do differently.

Have a good night.

Jean,

If you have concerns about a particular GLM model I'd suggest you e mail Amy directly at GLM (address on their website). Folks typically are more prone to listen when they aren't poked in the eye.

I shall have a good night, thank you.