I got the latter during the week but I hadn't time to take pictures yet. The difference in size is so obvious when both are displayed together that it is hard to believe they are 1/43 scale. In my opinion the 1985 seems a bit to small. I will try to post pictures of both soon.
"In my opinion the 1985 Eldorado seems a bit too small. I will try to post pictures of both soon."
"Too small you say?" Well Rich, knowing you can be as "fastidious" as I when it comes to detail, scale, fidelity, etc... let me point out that a comparison between those two SHOULD be extreme.
Many don't realize (although, no doubt you do ) that the largest America cars were not actually produced in the 1950's, as many believe, but rather in the 1970's - the '76 Eldo, of course, leads the way. 😉 😉 😉
Carsized.com does not have 1985 Eldos in their database, however, they do have 1985 Buick Rivieras - which, despite being based on the same GM C-platform, is slightly larger than the '85 Eldo.
Therefore.... if your scale comparison is more dramatic than this, then perhaps you have a legitimate gripe. But, if not...... then it's fair to say Stamp did their homework.
I await your critique with bated breath; it ought to be a good one! 😉 😉 😉
The only way to tell is by putting the calipers to them. Stamp does not usually miss fidelity by much. Still, Richard has a good eye. It will be interesting to find out.
John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA
@chris Not to nitpick, my 1967 Cadillac Coupe de Ville was three inches longer than the 1971 Cadillac Eldorado. Just sayin'... 😎
@gdh .... no, no... that makes sense. For 1971, Cadillac tooled an all new but smaller Eldorado, however, customers wanted "bigger." Therefore, by 1978 that 2-gen Eldo had "grown up" - considerably! 😬 😬 😬 😬
@nickies Awesome! Looks about right to me; I'd say Stamp nailed it. Congrats Rich, enjoy your Cadillacs! 😎 😀 😎
PS
Terrific colors!








