The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1994

Diecast Collector Forums

Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.

8Forums
195,000+Topics
1,276,000+Posts
10,000+Members

Stamp's 1964 Cadill...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Stamp's 1964 Cadillac Coupe DeVille Firemist Red Poly

15 Posts
7 Users
38 Reactions
64 Views
(@whodeytink)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 8434
Topic starter  
PXL 20261106 174607470
PXL 20261106 174617570
PXL 20261106 174626059
PXL 20261106 174639651
PXL 20261106 174646329

This topic was modified 21 hours ago by Mark Sweeney

   
Quote
(@perrone1)
Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 25692
 

Beautiful! Love the color. My 72 Corvette was one of three Firemist colors that year, Ontario Orange Firemist. The others were Indian Bonnet Yellow Firemist and Steel Cities Grey Firemist.



   
ReplyQuote
(@whodeytink)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 8434
Topic starter  

@perrone1 I was surprised by how much I like this color.  It's a good red color for a dignified looking Cadillac.



   
ReplyQuote
(@perrone1)
Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 25692
 

Posted by: @whodeytink
↑

@perrone1 I was surprised by how much I like this color.  It's a good red color for a dignified looking Cadillac.

Perfect term - dignified. Not an in-your-face bright red or a washed out red, it is dignified and elegant enough for the 62 CDV!

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 23935
 

Well, I'm impressed!   That top may be a tad high, but it's a terrific looking Cadillac model.    Congrats!  👍 👍 👍 



   
Tony Perrone reacted
ReplyQuote
(@michaeldetorrice)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2964
 

That is a great-looking automobile ..... both as a car and as a scale model. The color is really nice 



   
ReplyQuote
(@whodeytink)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 8434
Topic starter  

@chris It's approximately 1.5 Planck lengths too high per my calculations.



   
ReplyQuote
(@karl)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 8437
 

Posted by: @whodeytink
↑

@chris It's approximately 1.5 Planck lengths too high per my calculations.

Mark - I had no idea you were a physicist and knew that in the case of the Caddy roofline classical general relativity and standard quantum field theory cease to function independently.

 



   
ReplyQuote
John Merritt
(@jcarnutz)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 18716
 

A very sharp model - mine arrived in my house today.


John Merritt
South Lyon, Michigan - USA


   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 23935
 

@whodeytink    HA!     Precisely!    Too tall by the smallest amount, barely noticeable..... 😉



   
Tony Perrone reacted
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 23935
 

Posted by: @jcarnutz
↑

"A very sharp model...."

That's exactly the design language Billy Mitchel was going for; he loved "edges, creases, and linear forms."       😉 😉 



   
Tony Perrone reacted
ReplyQuote
(@whodeytink)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 8434
Topic starter  

@karl But only at the smallest level.  LoL



   
ReplyQuote
(@whodeytink)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 8434
Topic starter  

@chris It could be the angle of the pics that make the top look too tall.  Here's a side on shot.  Just looking at without a camera the height looks right but even in this shot it looks a little high.  Anyway, in hand it looks fine to me.  Maybe John can post his thoughts when he has a chance.

PXL 20261107 123812066

This post was modified 2 hours ago by Mark Sweeney

   
ReplyQuote
Benjamin S
(@modeldadeeee)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 2226
 

@whodeytink looks great to meeeeee.🫣



   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 23935
 

Posted by: @whodeytink
↑

"Anyway, in hand it looks fine to me." 

Yes indeed, looks great to me also... even if it is off by 1.5 Planck lengths....     😉 😉 

However, let's compare it to a 1:1 anyway, just for fun, shall we.....  🤔 🤔 🤔 

The software indicates that Stamp's '64 is pretty damn close - not bad.   Congratulations, it's a gorgeous Cadillac model!  😀 😊 🥂 

For Mark


   
ReplyQuote
Share: