and they are simply stunning. I ordered one of each color in top up format and Tom sent me matching numbers. Really, these models are sheer perfection and having the option of dual headlights vs quad is such a great idea.
Mine arrived today, too. And I got the sunset rose (top down) and the Indian turquoise (top up). I'll cite my new buddy @stewil for inspiring me to expand my knowledge of early car development. I normally would have only gotten one of these but after @dirn explained that the two different headlight configurations were made to align with different state regulations, I knew I had to have one of each. Not only are they beautifully rendered, but they illustrate an evolving history of the power different states had to affect automotive design.
In the decades before federal vehicle safety standards existed, automotive innovation was often constrained not by engineering limits but by a patchwork of state laws that governed everything from lighting placement to glass curvature. Tucker’s infamous center “Cyclops Eye” headlamp is one of the best-known examples: a functional safety feature that worked as intended but ran afoul of state regulations that limited cars to two forward-facing headlights. Tucker’s problem was not unique. Other manufacturers encountered similar barriers when they experimented with improved lighting systems, early center-mounted brake lights, electric turn signals, and even advanced windshield designs. In many cases, state codes specified exact numbers, locations, or configurations for components, leaving little room for deviation—even when the deviation improved safety or visibility.
As a result, automakers were forced to design vehicles to satisfy the most restrictive state rules or abandon innovations altogether. Ideas that later proved indispensable, such as high-mounted brake lamps or integrated turn signals, were delayed for years or decades simply because they lacked uniform legal acceptance. Features like hidden headlights, wraparound windshields, and early seat belts were similarly slowed or softened until laws evolved or federal standards finally unified requirements in the late 1960s. Tucker, lacking the resources and political insulation of larger manufacturers, was especially exposed to this environment. In hindsight, his headlamp controversy was less an outlier than a preview of how many forward-thinking automotive ideas would struggle until regulation caught up with technology.
Mine too - Sunset Rose, top up.
I apologize. I was remiss in telling these models are also available from Thorsten at Thorsten.sabrautsky and Rik at info@rixxan.nl.
Let's see some pics please. They sound fantastic. 😁

