Notifications
Clear all
The Lounge
15
Posts
10
Users
49
Reactions
582
Views
Topic starter
26/02/2024 8:54 am
John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA
26/02/2024 9:35 am
I was not a fan of the 63 and 64 Chrysler design but really liked this new look.This example besides being rare, was really a factory hotrod.
26/02/2024 9:50 am
Rare indeed!
John Bono
North Jersey
26/02/2024 1:54 pm
I was not a fan of the 63 and 64 Chrysler design but really liked this new look.This example besides being rare, was really a factory hotrod.
My thoughts as well Bob. The '65 & '66 were great looking cars.....the '67....not so much IMHO.
26/02/2024 2:23 pm
Though completely different than one another, my favorite Chrysler 300's were the '56 and '57.
John Kuvakas and Jack Dodds reacted
26/02/2024 2:32 pm
Though completely different than one another, my favorite Chrysler 300's were the '56 and '57.
I loved the '55 and '56, but the gaping mouth grille of the '57 thru '59 never really grabbed me. The '60 thru '62 and '65/66 are awesome cars as well.
John Kuvakas and Tony Perrone reacted
26/02/2024 2:52 pm
Though completely different than one another, my favorite Chrysler 300's were the '56 and '57.
I loved the '55 and '56, but the gaping mouth grille of the '57 thru '59 never really grabbed me. The '60 thru '62 and '65/66 are awesome cars as well.
Well, when you're right - you're right!
The '57 DID have a gaping grille; much like, and reminiscent of, Julia Roberts:
My '55 & '56 reminds me more of Charlize Theron:
26/02/2024 3:39 pm
My Mom's first new car was a 65 Newport Sedan. It had the 383 with a 4 barrell and it would move.
26/02/2024 4:08 pm
I was not a fan of the 63 and 64 Chrysler design but really liked this new look.This example besides being rare, was really a factory hotrod.
I'm the opposite of you Mr. Jackman. I prefer the '63/'64 Chrysler's over the new look in '65.
George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota
John Kuvakas reacted
26/02/2024 5:14 pm
@perrone1 Okay that makes sense to me now....I never thought Ms. Roberts was a looker....must have been the subliminal late 50s Chryco link. Mind you IMO the '60 Imperial was a closer match....
26/02/2024 7:32 pm
I didn't even know you could get a '65 Chrysler like this. Super rare!
Tony Perrone and John Kuvakas reacted
26/02/2024 10:28 pm
That is a great looking Chrysler 300 ! I generally really like Chrysler 300's from any year and this beauty is one you don't see very often ....... plus it has 2×4 413 cid V-8.
John Kuvakas and Tony Perrone reacted
27/02/2024 1:44 am
I was not a fan of the 63 and 64 Chrysler design but really liked this new look.This example besides being rare, was really a factory hotrod.
My thoughts as well Bob. The '65 & '66 were great looking cars.....the '67....not so much IMHO.
Ditto for me. I loved the glass headlight covers on the 300s and the New Yorkers, but the clear taillights on the New Yorkers sealed the deal!
27/02/2024 6:41 am
@perrone1 Okay that makes sense to me now....I never thought Ms. Roberts was a looker....must have been the subliminal late 50s Chryco link. Mind you IMO the '60 Imperial was a closer match....
HA! PERFECT Jack! 
John Kuvakas reacted