Wonderful. Honours pouring in thick and fast these days. I'm getting quite blasé about it.

Lucky you. I can't take things any further until I do a repeat login. Maybe the system just trusts you more than it trusts me!

I am still seeing the same issue on all forums. Clicking on a "stretched" image corrects it, and after doing that with the first image in a set, I can...

@jack-dodds One always looks forward to an astute and well-considered response to one's posts, and needless to say, you did not disappoint. (If you...

@geno Well, to be honest, I was just being facetious. As usual. (Noble sentiments aren't really my thing).

I've never really been into gardening at all. Would it be OK if I just go outside and drag my fingers through the dirt now and then? And maybe sniff o...

Ah. Never occurred to me that a search for such an old post would bring it back to the top of the stack. Mystery solved.

Based on the rather fuzzy shots in my Schoolboy's Illustrated Guide to American Cars I'm pretty sure the Plymouth is a '66 or '67, but it's my first c...

Well, yes, someone might run a search using keywords like "Dinky" and "Packard" and not realize a post that their search throws up is 5 years old. But...

Maybe Harvey could just gently explain to an idiot like me how (or why) this 2021 post got repeated here today, without anyone apparently wondering wh...

Well, I'm pleased to see the Think Tanked Awards Committee finally got around to responding. I was beginning to think there might be a little bit of N...

Well, Richard, that's an interesting comment from someone who has on occasion been fiercely critical of 1:43 models with detail shortcomings that were...