The Diecast Zone ยท Model Car Club Since 1997

Diecast Collector Forums

Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk โ€” new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.

8Forums
195,000+Topics
1,276,000+Posts
10,000+Members
1997Research From

1982 Lotus 91 John ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

1982 Lotus 91 John Player Special Ground Effects by Tecnomodel

12 Posts
6 Users
18 Reactions
1,796 Views
john3976
(@john3976)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1763
Topic starter  

1982 Lotus 91 John Player Special Ground Effects by Tecnomode

ย 

IMG 1740
IMG 1741

ย 

IMG 1743
IMG 1742

ย 

IMG 1744
IMG 1745

ย 

IMG 1747
IMG 1746

ย 

IMG 1749
IMG 1748

ย 

IMG 1751
IMG 1750

ย 

IMG 1752
IMG 1753

ย 

IMG 1754
IMG 1755

ย 

IMG 1757
IMG 1756

ย 

IMG 1759
IMG 1758


   
Steve Jacobs, Paul Rouffa, John Kuvakas and 3 people reacted
Quote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 23510
 

Sharp! ๐Ÿ˜Ž ๐Ÿ˜Žย 



   
John Kuvakas reacted
ReplyQuote
Gavin
(@gavin)
Famed Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1269
 

Love the JPS livery.ย  My first ever 1:18 was an old Corgi 72 in JPS (when I was 3).ย  Still have it somewhere.

So, no front wing on this?ย  Looks naked without.



   
ReplyQuote
David Green
(@david-green)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 10398
 

While not a particularly successful Lotus with only one victory in 1982, Colin Chapman once again showed his genius with this carbon fibre ground effects design. It was hampered by having an outdated Ford Cosworth engine in a new turbo era. With a better engine it might have been a championship winner. This is a beautiful well built model, John.ย 



   
ReplyQuote
john3976
(@john3976)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1763
Topic starter  

@gavin Like David said this was a ground effects car and it made so much down force a front wing was not required in this configuration, the Ford Cosworth engine was the weak link, the Turbo era had arrived and the none turbo Cosworth V-8 while a great engine could not compete head to head with the turbo charged engines that were entering Formula One. Lotus did get an engine deal with Renault for the 1983 season.



   
David Green reacted
ReplyQuote
john3976
(@john3976)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1763
Topic starter  

@david-green This is a resin model so it is purely a static display piece, the tires do not roll nor do the front tires turn, but this is a very nice looking car and being a ground effects design is unique looking not having the front wing, add the black and gold John Player Special paint scheme which in my opinion is one of if not the most iconic paint/sponsor scheme in Formula One history I had to have this car.



   
ReplyQuote
David Green
(@david-green)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 10398
 

@john3976ย 

Thanks John. I love this stuff. Thank you for your continued contributions.



   
Steve Jacobs reacted
ReplyQuote
(@franklemire)
Famed Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 3005
 

Interesting model from a development point of view - from a purely aesthetic point of view I prefer the Type 78 from 1977

f5
f11
f10
f4
f7
f8
f9
f6

ย 



   
ReplyQuote
john3976
(@john3976)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1763
Topic starter  

@franklemire Is that a True Scale Miniature Lotus?



   
ReplyQuote
Gavin
(@gavin)
Famed Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1269
 
Posted by: @john3976

@gavin Like David said this was a ground effects car and it made so much down force a front wing was not required in this configuration, the Ford Cosworth engine was the weak link, the Turbo era had arrived and the none turbo Cosworth V-8 while a great engine could not compete head to head with the turbo charged engines that were entering Formula One. Lotus did get an engine deal with Renault for the 1983 season.

Fascinating stuff, thanks for the history.ย  Very cool to see the innovation/experimentation at work.



   
ReplyQuote
(@franklemire)
Famed Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 3005
 

@john3976 Yes, that is a TSM model and I think one of their best.



   
Steve Jacobs reacted
ReplyQuote
Paul Rouffa
(@paul-rouffa)
Famed Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 2146
 
Posted by: @franklemire

from a development point of view

Not to mention historic.



   
Steve Jacobs reacted
ReplyQuote
Share: