More Mustangs, real...
 
Notifications
Clear all

More Mustangs, really?

22 Posts
7 Users
32 Reactions
3,343 Views
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10620
Topic starter  

I suppose the logic is, "Why re-invent the wheel?"  Factually speaking, Mustang models sell, and I suspect MNGT thought this was a sound (safe ) investment.  I further suppose it's easier to copy existing tooling. But obviously NOREV  spent "some"  capital to produce these replicas.  

But really?  Another $100 1/18 diecast 1966 Mustang?   And these are sealed.... I can get 1/18 '66 'Stangs  w/opening features for half that.  I sure wish NOREV  would've spent (and charged ) a bit more on something we haven't seen before. 🙄 😯 🙄 

...just saying.   😔 😔 

Nor M2
Nor M1


   
Steve Jacobs reacted
Quote
(@Anonymous 197205242)
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 5402
 

Very nice '66 Mustang replicas and both in excellent colors ! I really like that great-looking blue hardtop coupe. (but the red convertible is no slouch, either !)



   
ReplyQuote
(@ed-davis)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 3909
 

Are these models diecast or resin?


Ed Davis
Inverness, Illinois, USA


   
Steve Jacobs reacted
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 8164
 
Posted by: @chris

I suppose the logic is, "Why re-invent the wheel?"  Factually speaking, Mustang models sell, and I suspect MNGT thought this was a sound (safe ) investment.  I further suppose it's easier to copy existing tooling. But obviously NOREV  spent "some"  capital to produce these replicas.  

But really?  Another $100 1/18 diecast 1966 Mustang?   And these are sealed.... I can get 1/18 '66 'Stangs  w/opening features for half that.  I sure wish NOREV  would've spent (and charged ) a bit more on something we haven't seen before. 🙄 😯 🙄 

...just saying.   😔 😔 

Nor M2
Nor M1

No kidding ! 

Steve 



   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10620
Topic starter  
Posted by: @ed-davis

Are these models diecast or resin?

Sealed diecast Ed.



   
Ed Davis reacted
ReplyQuote
Gavin
(@gavin)
Famed Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1269
 

I think the models look really well done & I've been very happy with my other sealed diecast Norevs (289 Cobra, '69 Corvette Coupe & Porsche 935), but I'll be skipping these, as I don't need another 1st gen Mustang.

It is an interesting choice that didn't necessarily fill an obvious hole like the 289 Cobras did, but out of my 35 Mustangs, only 1 is a 1966, & that's a Shelby GT350.  A quick ebay search of 1966 Mustangs shows numerous Shelbys, these new Norevs & the insanely nice (& insanely expensive) Classic Carlectables.  Who else made the '66?

 



   
ReplyQuote
Marty Johnson
(@marty-johnson)
Famed Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1712
 

I can kind of understand the notchback '65 (not a '66), as I don't recall seeing one in the 1:18 scale.  However, the convertible '66 ('64, '65, '66) is quite common in lots of scales.  



   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10620
Topic starter  
Posted by: @gavin

It is an interesting choice that didn't necessarily fill an obvious hole like the 289 Cobras did

Right, that's the way I see it.   

What you stated regarding 1/18 '66 'Stangs is also true.... but most, I would argue, would "lump"  1964-1/2 - 1966 Mustangs together.  Looking at it in this way, there are many 1/18s. Still, the best bang for the buck  is Precision 100's  convertible.   I have Welly's  hardtop ONLY until I replace it with a Classic Carlectables....  which I passed on many years ago when they were "zero"  money.  🙁 😔 😓 🙁 

IMG 0535
PMM6
PMM10


   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10620
Topic starter  
Posted by: @marty-johnson

I can kind of understand the notchback '65 (not a '66), as I don't recall seeing one in the 1:18 scale.  However, the convertible '66 ('64, '65, '66) is quite common in lots of scales.  

Right! 😏   ...and yes, That blue coupe is a 1965, not a '66.



   
ReplyQuote
Gavin
(@gavin)
Famed Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1269
 
Posted by: @chris

What you stated regarding 1/18 '66 'Stangs is also true.... but most, I would argue, would "lump"  1964-1/2 - 1966 Mustangs together.  Looking at it in this way, there are many 1/18s. 

totally agree with that.  I'm sure there are some completists out there that want the '66s, but I have enough 1st gens.



   
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 8164
 

I like that you changed the wheels on the Precision 100. With a commitment to detail that they had on that model I can't believe they let those wonky looking wired wheels make it to production. Just my two cents otherwise I think that model is practically perfect. 

Steve 



   
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 8164
 
Posted by: @chris

I suppose the logic is, "Why re-invent the wheel?"  Factually speaking, Mustang models sell, and I suspect MNGT thought this was a sound (safe ) investment.  I further suppose it's easier to copy existing tooling. But obviously NOREV  spent "some"  capital to produce these replicas.  

But really?  Another $100 1/18 diecast 1966 Mustang?   And these are sealed.... I can get 1/18 '66 'Stangs  w/opening features for half that.  I sure wish NOREV  would've spent (and charged ) a bit more on something we haven't seen before. 🙄 😯 🙄 

...just saying.   😔 😔 

Nor M2
Nor M1

I'm not so sure that the turquoise one is a '66.

After looking at a larger picture I don't see the 'fingers' coming out of that chrome insert just before the rear wheelwell like I do on the red convertible. I thought that was an option on the '66.  

Steve 



   
ReplyQuote
Gavin
(@gavin)
Famed Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1269
 

Marty mentioned above that the blue notchback is a '65...I'm a Mustang fan, but I don't know the detail changes on the early models.



   
ReplyQuote
John Kuvakas
(@jkuvakas)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 9698
 

Those strakes on the side scoop were standard for '66. They were how we could tell the difference. 


John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA


   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10620
Topic starter  
Posted by: @100ford2003

I like that you changed the wheels on the Precision 100.

Yes, thank you Steve. You'll recall I posted all the details a while back. Such a great model deserves BETTER wheels.  Incidentally, Ertl's 1/12 1964 Mustang convertible sports the same, but larger, TERRIBLE tires & rims!   😫 😫 😫 

Er M 2
Er M 1


   
ReplyQuote
Page 1 / 2
Share: