The Diecast Zone Β· Model Car Club Since 1994

Diecast Collector Forums

Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk β€” new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.

8Forums
195,000+Topics
1,276,000+Posts
10,000+Members

More Mustangs, real...
 
Notifications
Clear all

More Mustangs, really?

22 Posts
7 Users
32 Reactions
4,392 Views
Marty Johnson
(@marty-johnson)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 27190
 

@jkuvakas - The grill and dashboard gauge display were different as well.Β  The grill didn't have the vertical and horizontal pieces surrounding the center Mustang logo.Β  The gauge display had a round speedometer flanked by two smaller gauges on either side.Β  It also had left-right turn signal indicators instead of a single light for either direction.Β 

images
dashboard


   
ReplyQuote
Marty Johnson
(@marty-johnson)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 27190
 

@chris - They did the same with the fastback, too!Β  The model is unbelievably good!Β  The tires are just horrible!Β Β 

2


   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 23687
Topic starter  

@marty-johnson Correct! Great model (I have one ) but horrible tires on nice rims.  I swapped out the tires, kept the rims and put these wheels on my convertible. 😎 

PMM5
PMM11


   
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 13072
 
Posted by: @chris
Posted by: @100ford2003

I like that you changed the wheels on the Precision 100.

Yes, thank you Steve. You'll recall I posted all the details a while back. Such a great model deserves BETTER wheels.  Incidentally, Ertl's 1/12 1964 Mustang convertible sports the same, but larger, TERRIBLE tires & rims!   😫 😫 😫 

Er M 2
Er M 1

Yep, it was quite a few years ago but I still remember your posts about the wheels.Β 

SteveΒ 



   
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 13072
 
Posted by: @chris
Posted by: @gavin

It is an interesting choice that didn't necessarily fill an obvious hole like the 289 Cobras did

Right, that's the way I see it.Β  Β 

What you stated regarding 1/18 '66 'Stangs is also true.... but most, I would argue, would "lump"Β  1964-1/2 - 1966 Mustangs together.Β  Looking at it in this way, there are many 1/18s. Still, the best bang for the buckΒ  is Precision 100'sΒ  convertible.Β  Β I have Welly'sΒ  hardtop ONLY until I replace it with a Classic Carlectables....Β Β which I passed on many years ago when they were "zero"Β  money.Β  πŸ™ πŸ˜” πŸ˜“ πŸ™Β 

IMG 0535
PMM6
PMM10

Chris,Β 

I have the Tahoe Turquoise Carlectables languishing in my garage. Contact me either here or 'mustangboi53atgmail.com' if interested. I would be happy to remit a fee to the Forums.

SteveΒ 



   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 23687
Topic starter  

@100ford2003 Thanks Steve, I really do appreciate that, but conducting business with forum members is something I just don't do. Over the years, I've received requests to complete projects, paint model, fabricate parts, etc... but always, I've declined. Same for buying/selling.Β  Again, THANK YOU for the interest/offer.

-Chris



   
Steve Jacobs reacted
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 13072
 
Posted by: @chris

@100ford2003 Thanks Steve, I really do appreciate that, but conducting business with forum members is something I just don't do. Over the years, I've received requests to complete projects, paint model, fabricate parts, etc... but always, I've declined. Same for buying/selling.Β  Again, THANK YOU for the interest/offer.

-Chris

You bet.Β 

SteveΒ 



   
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2
Share: