The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1997

Diecast Collector Forums

Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.

8Forums
195,000+Topics
1,276,000+Posts
10,000+Members
1997Research From

Danbury Mint 1936 P...
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] Danbury Mint 1936 Packard Phaeton

21 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
7 Views
(@phil-r)
Reputable Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 159
Topic starter  

Guess im in the minority with the color being DRAB! Yes it IS almost black

Thats my point it might as well be black! As for the paint. I recently got the corrected one and its going back due to a few small missing parts and less then pleasant paint job. I am keeping the ORIGINAL one I got, but the paint on that wasn't well polished either and had a lot of swirl marks and fine scratches in the paint. I polished the heck out of it when I got it so it looks ok now. I was going to keep the second one for speculation purposes but will pass! This model would have benefitted from being done in that beatiful creme color IMO



   
(@David Harvey)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

Phil, I agree DM could have generated a huge demand with a repaint in the creme color. My complaint is with the sloppy quality control I've seen in the corrected white wall version. They must have used a different factory with less skilled workers, because all four of the examples I've seen have serious flaws in paint and/or assembly.



   
(@Rick Hanmore)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

To honestly answer that question...

the hood ornament was not on the car when it was photographed. The owner removes it when the car is not shown and places the standard cap in its place. Says that it rips his car cover. No one there thought to ask about it and I guess the owner did not mention that he had the Cormorant cap. The color, "Packard Blue" is very dark...in fact we lightened it a bit on the replica because it looked too black. We thought the blue leather was pretty cool, though, and since the car has some provenance, (originally owned by Chicago Tribune owner Robert McCormick), we wanted to keep the model true to the original, (including what we thought was the original radiator cap). If it if any consequence, the follow-up LE to this car was to be Packard Cream. I'm surprised that a sample of that one has not shown up on e-Bay yet since it was in development when the factory closed.



   
(@phil-r)
Reputable Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 159
Topic starter  

thats a shame!



   
(@phil-r)
Reputable Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 159
Topic starter  

Thanks Rick! I hope the tooling wasn't lost or destroyed

If DM makes an LE creme colored version I will add it to my collection as well and keep the DARK blue one. Nothing not to love about Packards! Smile



   
(@David Harvey)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

Thanks for your response and insight. It is great to hear commentary from one who knows and can answer our questions and speculations.



   
Page 2 / 2
Share: