One more Holden
 
Notifications
Clear all

One more Holden

6 Posts
4 Users
12 Reactions
1,667 Views
Rich Sufficool
(@rich-sufficool)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 4911
Topic starter  

This Holden Model 48-215 was produced from 1948-1953 preceding the Holden FJ. This was originally a design by Chevrolet in the US that wasn't used as it was deemed too small a vehicle for the American market. It was the first GM Australia car to bear the Holden name. I bought this model of their 1953 Monte Carlo entrant because... I thought it was cute. LOL

53 Holden MCR 005
1 53 Holden MCR 008
53 Holden MCR 023
53 Holden MCR 018
53 Holden MCR 003
53 Holden MCR 016
53 Holden MCR 012
53 Holden MCR 019
53 Holden MCR 010

 



   
John Merritt, David Green, Tony Perrone and 3 people reacted
Quote
john barry
(@john-barry)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 11084
 

beautifully photographed,the car is an ABSOLUTE GEM 😯 



   
ReplyQuote
(@perrone1)
Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 18558
 
Posted by: @john-barry

beautifully photographed,the car is an ABSOLUTE GEM 😯 

+1.

You've got to know when to Holden,
Know when to fold 'em;
Know when to walk away,
And know when to run.



   
ReplyQuote
Rich Sufficool
(@rich-sufficool)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 4911
Topic starter  

@perrone1 I ask you, sir... have you no shame?!?!



   
ReplyQuote
(@perrone1)
Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 18558
 
Posted by: @rich-sufficool

@perrone1 I ask you, sir... have you no shame?!?!

LOL! You know me  -  apparently not! Shut Mouth  



   
ReplyQuote
John Merritt
(@jcarnutz)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 5496
 

That looks like an excellent model. I have one in that color, but a standard version. I've considered this one, just never got it.

 

A revision to my comment... I went to see if this model was still available on the UR Trading site, it was, so it will be soon be part of my collection. Thanks Rich for your new post. 


John Merritt
South Lyon, Michigan - USA


   
ReplyQuote
Share: