The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1997
Diecast Collector Forums
Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.
PICS 1:1 - Thursday 1954 Buick Skylark Convertible
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
photo no longer available
Stunning!
ABSOLUTELY GORGEOUS!!!!
I know I'm in the minority here but other than the front end, it's fugly.
DM, where are you?
Better than brand new - very impressive
I like it better than the 53 Skylark. Best pictures yet.
Mark
The car is beautiful; the make, model and year are Fugly.
Wowsa! Dynamite color combo!
John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA
LOVE the car! The white fender wells bug me though.
I agree with Doug, that and the color.
I absolutely love this car!
PIC - Without coves...
photo no longer available
MUCH better. Still don't like the add-on tail light treatment though.
Gene I understand most people don't like the 54 but to me
It looks much smaller, sleeker, lighter and a little sportier than the 53. Don't ever remember seeing one in person (I was born in Dec 1953) until, attending a Buick show in the mid eighties at the GM Tech Center.
I dont think the 54 sold very well because of the wild for 1954 design, especially the wheel scallopes, the short deck and tail light design. Some say Harley Earl tried to copy a jet plane on the back end design, causing designers to rush a new look for the 54 model year.
Gene, do you know if it is the same body and chassis as the 53?
Mark