The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1997

Diecast Collector Forums

Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.

8Forums
195,000+Topics
1,276,000+Posts
10,000+Members
1997Research From

PICS 1:1 - Thursday
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] PICS 1:1 - Thursday

30 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
11 Views
(@Larry Hooper)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

PICS 1:1 - Thursday 1954 Buick Skylark Convertible
photo no longer available

photo no longer available

photo no longer available

photo no longer available

photo no longer available

photo no longer available

photo no longer available

photo no longer available

photo no longer available

photo no longer available

photo no longer available

photo no longer available

photo no longer available

photo no longer available

photo no longer available

photo no longer available

photo no longer available



   
(@Thomas Struckman)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

Stunning!



   
Frank Kocour
(@kocour)
Noble Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 911
 

ABSOLUTELY GORGEOUS!!!!



   
(@Douglas Ford)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

I know I'm in the minority here but other than the front end, it's fugly.



   
(@Steve Kiraly)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

DM, where are you?



   
(@Ron Dietrich)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

Better than brand new - very impressive



   
 Mark
(@mark)
Active Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 8
 

I like it better than the 53 Skylark. Best pictures yet.


Mark


   
Brush
(@brush)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 13762
 

The car is beautiful; the make, model and year are Fugly.



   
John Kuvakas
(@jkuvakas)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 27554
 

Wowsa! Dynamite color combo!


John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA


   
(@Bill Willard)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

LOVE the car! The white fender wells bug me though.



   
(@Gene Mills)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

I agree with Doug, that and the color.



   
Marty Johnson
(@marty-johnson)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 27190
 

I absolutely love this car!



   
Marty Johnson
(@marty-johnson)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 27190
 

PIC - Without coves...

photo no longer available



   
(@Douglas Ford)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

MUCH better. Still don't like the add-on tail light treatment though.



   
 Mark
(@mark)
Active Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 8
 

Gene I understand most people don't like the 54 but to me

It looks much smaller, sleeker, lighter and a little sportier than the 53. Don't ever remember seeing one in person (I was born in Dec 1953) until, attending a Buick show in the mid eighties at the GM Tech Center.
I dont think the 54 sold very well because of the wild for 1954 design, especially the wheel scallopes, the short deck and tail light design. Some say Harley Earl tried to copy a jet plane on the back end design, causing designers to rush a new look for the 54 model year.
Gene, do you know if it is the same body and chassis as the 53?


Mark


   
Page 1 / 2
Share: