Selling Corvettes i...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Selling Corvettes in 1975... [PIC]

8 Posts
4 Users
14 Reactions
194 Views
Rich Sufficool
(@rich-sufficool)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 4925
Topic starter  

By 1975, you really couldn't convince anyone that the Corvette was a powerful, high performance sports car. The standard 350 V8 put out an embarrassing 165 HP and the optional L-82 350, a mere 205 HP. So, let's dress it up with a sumptuous leather and faux wood interior with lots of trim and put a luggage rack over the pop top center mounted fuel filler (which had to be pretty annoying) and call it a grand touring car/cruiser. And if you felt it wasn't enough, photograph with a gorgeous model in a color matching bikini and you've got a "What kind of man reads Playboy?" advertisement.

75Vette 001
75Vette 016
75Vette 018
75Vette 015 003
75Vette 005
75Vette 007
75Vette 006 001
75Vette 019
75Vette 011 001
75Vette 008 001

 



   
John Napoli, Geno, Steve Jacobs and 2 people reacted
Quote
(@bob-jackman)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 15090
 

Love the pictures and the model. The thing about model cars is that they don't show the performance of the 1/1 so the 67 427 435 HP model doesn't hold an advantage over this government regulated version.



   
John Napoli, Steve Jacobs, Jack Dodds and 1 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 21274
 

I wish that GM had made the tail end piece part of the body shell (one piece in other words). I always thought that the recessed tail light design was great but the "stuck on" look spoiled it somewhat.



   
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7860
 

101% agree Jack. I'm not a vette aficionado but wasn't there a year the tail was split vertically in two pieces ? 



   
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 21274
 

@100ford2003 YES......ugh!



   
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7860
 

@jack-dodds 

'74 was it.



   
ReplyQuote
Rich Sufficool
(@rich-sufficool)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 4925
Topic starter  

@jack-dodds It's a separate piece in order for the car to pass the 5 mph crash test. It was a plastic piece to absorb shock with minimal damage.



   
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 21274
 

@rich-sufficool Interesting.  Thanks for this info Rich.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: