Which will you add to your collection? A bit of a racing theme from them lately...
1950 Tatra 201 Pritschenwagen (CZ, 1950)
Beginning in 1948, Tatra introduced a new passenger car to the Czechoslovak market through state-run dealerships under the name Tatra 600, also known as the Tatraplan. The vehicle was powered by an air-cooled, nearly two-liter, four-cylinder boxer engine with fan-assisted cooling. In keeping with Tatra’s distinctive engineering philosophy, the engine was mounted at the rear.
With the start of series production, plans emerged to develop commercial variants based on the same platform. These proposed utility models were designated T 201 in the company’s type registry and were intended to retain the Tatra 600’s boxer engine. A pickup (Pritschenwagen) version was also envisioned; however, to accommodate a practical cargo bed, this variant featured a front-mounted engine configuration.
Documentation on the T 201 prototype is extremely limited. Only a small number of photographs and a rudimentary side-view sketch containing basic technical data are known to survive. Due to the scarcity of archival material, the reasons the T 201 never progressed to production remain speculative. Its subsequent fate is equally uncertain apart from the fact that no example is known to have survived.
1967 BMC-1800 Pininfarina
The Austin 1800 ranked among the United Kingdom’s most popular passenger cars during the 1960s. As its styling began to show its age, Austin’s management turned to the Italian design house Pininfarina to develop a more contemporary appearance.
The project was assigned to designers Leonardo Fioravanti and Paolo Martin. Working within a tight timeframe, they produced a striking new concept informed by the aerodynamic research of Wunibald Kamm. In the 1930s, Kamm had demonstrated that a sharply truncated rear profile, later known as the “Kamm tail,” could deliver significant aerodynamic benefits. Fioravanti and Martin refined this principle through wind tunnel testing and applied the resulting form to the chassis of a standard Austin 1800, creating a fully functional prototype.
Pininfarina unveiled the car in 1967. Its wedge-shaped body and gently sloping fastback silhouette appeared remarkably futuristic, yet the design was engineered with series production in mind. The streamlined exterior enclosed a spacious passenger compartment and featured distinctive details, including headlights concealed beneath a glass cover.
Despite its technical sophistication and forward-looking form, the concept was ultimately rejected in Britain. While Austin chose not to proceed with production, industry experts responded with considerable enthusiasm. Many observers regarded the design as a pioneering contribution to European automotive engineering—a judgment that, in retrospect, proved well founded.
1979 Ferrari 312 T4A
Ferrari engineer Mauro Forghieri led the development of the highly successful 312T4, the car that secured the 1979 Formula 1 World Championship Drivers’ title, the runner-up position, and the Constructors’ Championship for Scuderia Ferrari.
The 1979 season was defined above all by the concept of ground effect. First exploited effectively by Lotus, this aerodynamic principle reshaped Formula 1 engineering. Ferrari’s technical team quickly adapted, designing the 312T4’s underbody to maximize the low-pressure effect beneath the car—an innovation critical to generating downforce without increasing drag.
From a chassis dynamics standpoint, Forghieri configured the suspension geometry to ensure that airflow beneath the car encountered minimal disturbance. To refine the aerodynamic package, Ferrari experimented with extended rear sections and alternative body configurations, all of which were evaluated through rigorous track testing. One of these experimental prototypes illustrates the evolutionary steps taken toward the final competition specification.
At the start of the 1979 season, the 312T4 was not yet fully optimized. However, beginning with the third race, factory drivers Jody Scheckter and Gilles Villeneuve campaigned the new car and quickly demonstrated its competitive superiority.
Over the course of the season, Villeneuve delivered flashes of brilliance but struggled with inconsistency, alternating strong finishes with retirements and lower placings. By contrast, Scheckter drove with calculated consistency, regularly finishing in the points. At season’s end, the South African clinched the World Drivers’ Championship with 51 points, finishing just four points ahead of Villeneuve.
And from their Avenue43 line...
Audi 100 S4 GTO
The Audi 100 S4 GTO was an ambitious mid-1980s prototype developed for a proposed Group B “GTO” circuit racing category. Based on the C3-generation Audi 100, the car was conceived as a high-performance silhouette racer that would translate Audi’s rally dominance to closed-circuit competition. Although the category was envisioned as a platform for powerful grand touring cars exceeding two liters of displacement, it never fully materialized, and the S4 GTO project remained experimental.
Technically, the car drew heavily from Audi’s successful Group B rally program. It was powered by a turbocharged inline five-cylinder engine derived from rally competition, producing in excess of 600 horsepower in some development stages. Power was delivered through Audi’s permanent quattro all-wheel-drive system, a defining feature of the brand’s motorsport identity. The bodywork was extensively modified with widened fenders, aggressive aerodynamic elements, and lightweight construction, transforming the conservative Audi 100 sedan into an uncompromising racing machine.
The cancellation of Group B racing in 1986, prompted by safety concerns in rallying, effectively ended prospects for the GTO circuit category as well. As a result, the Audi 100 S4 GTO never competed in an official championship. Nevertheless, the project remains a fascinating “what-if” chapter in Audi’s motorsport history, illustrating the company’s determination during the 1980s to extend its technological leadership—particularly its turbocharged engines and quattro system—into every major arena of international racing.
That Tatra pickup is really cool but I need to stick with my 'no foreign brands' rule or things will spiral further out of control.
Scheckter clinched the title by winning the Italian GP. Mattel made a replica of that car. No doubt there are several differences that would be visible if the two were side-by-side. The engine covering definitely got changed.
Randy, thank you for adding the detailed background to all these new releases. Very enjoyable and enlightening.
I have several Tatras representing various decades in my collection and think this pickup would fit in with them just nicely. Something a bit different!
@mg-harv I thought the same thing. This is a very weird Autocult, because it is so close to a car that has been produced all over the place in 1:43 - Minichamps, Hot Wheels, Brumm, part works, ... 😆 hobbyDB
Some more background - https://www.maronline.org.uk/autocult-news-into-spring/
































