The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1994
Diecast Collector Forums
Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.
Thanks for pictures of the cars and the signs. They look like jet planes without wings, which was probably the intent.
Ed Davis
Inverness, Illinois, USA
OMG David - you've touched a nerve with me - BUT a wonderful 'Car Nerve'!
When I first saw black & white photos of the Firebird I, I was 7 and in love with that machine. Then I saw the Firebird II and, love at first sight, I forgot all a bout my puppy love with the first one. Then, at 12, when I laid eyes on the third magnificent rocket ship I thought no other car could possibly take its place ever again.
Thank you sir - fantastic post!!
more than cool and highly interesting............
Incredibly cool ! When I was a small kid I had a working Ideal Toy car of the Firebird I vehicle.
I have to admit that I never understood cars that look like planes designed by a car company.
@bob-jackman On the whole I agree, with perhaps a few exceptions: The Cadillac Cyclone II being top of that small list.
I think perhaps these may a been a jet/rocket car of the future meant for traveling long distances on the automated, sensor-controlled "Highway of the Future" that GM and others thought wasn't that far off. Yet, the actual existing real world has a say in all this, too, so ........
I never understood cars that look like planes
Maybe so Bob, but without the Lockheed P-38 influencing Harley Earl, thus initiating the "fin craze" in 1948, the 1950's could've looked a whole lot different. 😏 🤔 😏 🤨
thanks David great pics and info
@chris At least the Cadillac was a car that had practical purposes. I do understand your comments.
The FB I sort of reminds me of a salt flats belly tanker. Cool stuff.
John Bono
North Jersey
At least the Cadillac was a car that had practical purposes. I do understand your comments.
It was the concept car's fins that had a "practical" purpose, in theory. The FB-airplane-fins were supposed to help to stabilize the cars at high speeds...which is a practical application.
The Cadillacs of the 1950's (and all other finned cars ) had fins that were not practical; they served no purpose other than style-love it or hate it.
Personally, I love 'em! 😎 😎 😎



















