The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1994
Diecast Collector Forums
Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.
after letting it sit in my 'in progress' file for a bit, I took a closer look. My real issue is with the very chrome heavy front end and the front to back proportions of the car, as presented. So, I did some edits to see if I could improve the car a bit.
As found:
Slimmed front bumper, decreased wheel size, mild dechroming:
Extended upper grill surround, altered rear quarter panel shape & length:
Raised front bumper, went a bit smaller on wheel size, further refined rear quarter panel shape:
Altered shape of and slimmed front bumper:
Further slimmed front bumper:
As shared in introductory text, my edits were made in the interest of slimming the heavily chromed front grill/bumper area and improving the front-to-rear proportions.
Was I successful?
Enjoy!
I like the 4th pic the best. It seems the best balanced. JMHO though. Very cool.😊
Last shot for me. I like the thin and lean look o f the chrome. It now looks ready to rock!
With each move, the car showed improvement. The tire/wheel size could still be further down sized IMO.
They all look the same to me.
John Bono
North Jersey
Sorry guys, regardless of which version of this concept I look at, I DON'T like it. If I saw it at a car show, I'd walk past it as fast as I could.
George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota
@jack-dodds Beautiful Matador Jack. When they were introduced in the mid-seventies they looked very odd to me compared to the GM, Ford, and Chrysler offerings. But now I wouldn't mind having one.
@pete-rovero I felt much the same back in the day Pete. I doubt many of these cars survived so they may be collectible in the future; I don't recall seeing one at any car show to date.
@jack-dodds At my age, I don't believe I'll buy one for investment purposes. The Oleg Cassini version is the one to have.













