The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1994

Diecast Collector Forums

Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.

8Forums
195,000+Topics
1,276,000+Posts
10,000+Members

"Car of the Da...
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] "Car of the Day"

13 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
17 Views
(@James Schmittinger)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 


   
(@Terry Bornt)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

Oh Man! Love it! But what happened to the small block chevy? Was that flathead an option in 36? LOL



   
Frank Kocour
(@kocour)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 16123
 

What a sweetheart!



   
(@Martin Soriano)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

Finally a Ford without a chevy engine!!! I want one of these for Christmas!!!!



   
(@Steve Kiraly)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

Without a doubt, the prettiest '36 I've ever laid eyes on!



   
(@Johan Bj?rndahl)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

Truly unique condition,love the detail pictures.Thank´s Jimmy!



   
(@John Luthi)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

Very sweet - but it could stand to loose the skirts.



   
(@Jerry Gorsuch)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

WOW.....Sweet.....and it's all Ford.......and not red.....LOL



   
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 33464
 

Jim, if only Ford would reproduce this car with current materials and technology they would have a true winner on their hands. I would buy one today!!


John Bono
North Jersey


   
(@Roger Pratt)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

A real winner, one of the nicest you've posted, Jim. Thanks



   
(@Steve O'Neill)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 

This may be the Nicest Restored Ford ever ! Do you know the Price ?



   
(@James Schmittinger)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
 


   
Frank Kocour
(@kocour)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 16123
 

Steve . . . GO FOR IT!



   
Share: