(Pics) 1967 Chevrol...
 
Notifications
Clear all

(Pics) 1967 Chevrolet Impala

24 Posts
8 Users
50 Reactions
4,324 Views
Chris Sweetman
(@chris-sweetman)
Noble Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 425
 

@mikedetorrice Hi Mike Wonderful photos and the Kinsmart 1967 Chevrolet Impala looks truly fabulous. Just looked on ebay and seen some for £6 plus £12 postage! Plus it has opening front doors - amazing!


Autominologist residing in the Robin Hood County
Nottinghamshire England UK


   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10375
 
Posted by: @moe-parr

A Chevrolet more luxurious than a Buick? 🤔

Happens all the time.  The Caprice was the top-of-the-line Chevrolet, while the LeSabre was the bottom of the barrel full-size Buick. Skylarks cost less but they were smaller.

Even today, one can purchase a stripped down base Cadillac XT-4, yet walk to the Ford dealership an order a fully loaded Escape ST-Line Platinum Elite.  That Escape will be much more impressive than the Caddy.



   
Jack Dodds reacted
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 197205242)
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 5402
Topic starter  

Thanks, Chris ! It is a good-looking automobile, both real and the scale model and it has the opening doors, too. Plus, the low price is a real bargain.



   
ReplyQuote
(@moe-parr)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 2343
 
Posted by: @chris
Posted by: @moe-parr

A Chevrolet more luxurious than a Buick? 🤔

Happens all the time.  The Caprice was the top-of-the-line Chevrolet, while the LeSabre was the bottom of the barrel full-size Buick. Skylarks cost less but they were smaller.

Even today, one can purchase a stripped down base Cadillac XT-4, yet walk to the Ford dealership an order a fully loaded Escape ST-Line Platinum Elite.  That Escape will be much more impressive than the Caddy.

Yes, but I don't think that was always the case. Back in the 40s and early to mid-50s, even the top-trim Chevy/Ford/Plymouth didn't out-luxury the lower trim Buick/Lincoln/Chrysler.


Barry Levittan
Long Island, NY


   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10375
 
Posted by: @moe-parr

Yes, but I don't think that was always the case.

Well, that's exactly right but as you know, nothing lasts forever...consumer tastes change, and marketing must keep pace.  Eighty years from now owners will be debating their de-spooler RX times vs. stationary influxer rates.  Bp-7s & Bpd-2s can integrate, theoretically, but host-pod sequencing will be compromised.

Pod 2
Pod


   
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 21287
 

@chris Hmmmm.....I basically agree but I'm not so sure about the host pod sequencing being compromised. Nerd



   
ReplyQuote
John Kuvakas
(@jkuvakas)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 9637
 

@jack-dodds, I think you may be right. In order for the host pod sequencing to be compromised, the geospatial regulator would have to be disabled.


John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA


   
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 21287
 

@jkuvakas Exactly!  You said a mouthful there JK; right on the money again!  Snipping the yellow wire is the best way to achieve this....as you well know.



   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10375
 

- You guys are funny.....    but eighty years ago, right after WW II, researchers, scientists, Ph.Ds, and engineers were discussing vehicle blue-tooth compatible options for touch-screen navigation & integrated infotainment displays vs. direct USB plug-ins and hard-wired accessories. 

Jokers ridiculed them too. 

LoL    Shock Unamused Wink LoL  



   
John Kuvakas reacted
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2
Share: