IT GREW ON ME!
 
Notifications
Clear all

IT GREW ON ME!

7 Posts
4 Users
16 Reactions
1,232 Views
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7215
Topic starter  

When I first saw the 1962 PLYMOUTH'S as a kid, it appeared to me to be one of the oddest looking cars I'd ever seen.  And when asked to name a car that from a styling perspective, I thought missed the mark, the '62 Plymouth was usually the one that came to mind.  

But in just the last few years, I've found myself gravitating to this car with more appreciation of its unique and different look.  That appreciation has moved this Plymouth over to my list of cars that I now find attractive, perhaps because of its oddness.  

Now when attending old car shows, I find myself enjoying a '62 Plymouth more than the usual Chevy's and Ford's (or most every other car) of that same year.  Lesson learned, never say never.

 

62 PLYMOUTH FURY #1B (2018 12 15 23 43 45 UTC)
62 PLYMOUTH FURY #1A (2018 12 15 23 43 45 UTC)
62 PLYMOUTH SPORT FURY #DKDKID875TDRE5 (2019 09 12 16 23 28 UTC)

George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
Ira Gillispie, Pete Rovero, John Kuvakas and 7 people reacted
Quote
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 9238
 

I loved these from the get-go, but I prefer the base (Savoy) body style.


John Bono
North Jersey


   
ReplyQuote
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7215
Topic starter  
Posted by: @sizedoesmatter

I loved these from the get-go, but I prefer the base (Savoy) body style.

I've seen a couple of the base Savoy's at local car shows, both Red.  They are eye-drawing.  


George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
John Bono and John Bono reacted
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 20724
 

I have always thought the 62 Fury 2drht. was a very decent looking car; it was the Dodge that took me very many years to warm up to.



   
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 20724
 

I have always thought the 62 Fury 2drht. was a very decent looking car; it was the Dodge that took me very many years to warm up to.  I will say though that they could have been a little more imaginative with the Fury tail light selection.



   
ReplyQuote
Brush
(@brush)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 2860
 

Plymouth & Dodge: 1955 to 1960  alright, 1961 to 1963 don't care for, 1964 to 1972 good.



   
ReplyQuote
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7215
Topic starter  
Posted by: @jack-dodds

I have always thought the 62 Fury 2drht. was a very decent looking car; it was the Dodge that took me very many years to warm up to.  I will say though that they could have been a little more imaginative with the Fury tail light selection.

I know what you mean about the Dodge, as the grille and headlight arrangement takes some getting used to.  However, I do like the rear-end treatment better than the Plymouth's for '62.  This said though, for the same reasons I've come to like the Plymouth, I also like the Dodge.  They look enough alike, yet are unique in their own way.  

62 DODGE #AA987KDJ38 (2019 07 27 11 53 10 UTC)

George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
ReplyQuote
Share: