'56 Ford or Mercury?
Be sure to make your selection.
Of course, please “Reply” to share your comments.
If selection is greater than 2 rank them.
Click on the picture to enlarge the image.
John Bono
North Jersey
To me, the Fairlane looks jaunty! The Montclair looks showy. I'm going with jaunty.
I agree with Tony. The Mercury looks overdone.
Retired in Dunedin, Florida.
Ford for the reasons stated above.
I agree, the Mercury looks overdone, which is what Ford was looking for, since the Mercury was supposed to be a better class.
This year Ford Fairlane has always been my fave Ford of its decade; it beats the gorgeous Mercury by a slim margin. In '55 this order would be reversed.
'56 FoMoCo best year of the '50's, love all their makes. I choose my picks on this sight by the car model, not the picture presented here, in other words[car model, not the picture] which one would I buy. Mercury is what I would have bought in'56, a hard top though. By the pictures presented I agree with most here the Ford does look better and I would be proud to own either one.
Vote today, the Mercury.
I quite like both and was tempted to a tie. On reflection I went Ford because of slightly less chrome. In the day, more chrome was considered better, but now.
I had to concede to vote a TIE on this one. I think '56 FoMoCo brands rocked.
One minor comment, some here know I've expressed the importance to me for a dashboard to be exciting to look at, as that is primarily all I (as the driver) ever see, so that said, the Ford does have the better dash of these '56's.
George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota
I voted a tie. I have always liked the 52-57 Ford and Mercury.
Ford by a country mile. One of my very first favorite car designs at about age 6 or 7.
thanks again John for continuing to post this great series.

