Pontiac for me. The Dodge isn't that bad, but the front end styling looks a little vague and ill-defined compared with the sharpness of the sides and rear end.
Not a great fan of the Chrysler Corp "narrowing towards the base" rear pillar styling, although these aren't as exaggerated as some. I wondered about some alternative arrangements
but as usual, if you prefer the original that's OK, this is just me fooling around to pass the time.
Graeme.M. Ogg
London U.K.
Yup, guess that is why I prefer the Dodge plain/simple, it looks like a car. The Pontiac to me look similar to today's cars, lumps/bumps all over the place. That is me all right, uninspiring. I always wanted to blend in with the crowd, not stand out. Fancy, no thank you.Pontiac styling in'65 was just outstanding; it makes the Dodge styling look old and uninspired.
@graeme-ogg I prefer the original, the straight down is OK, don't care for the formal.
What Tony said!The Monaco is awfully nice. But the Grand Prix is nicer.
Gents, thanks for your responses and the kind words.
John Bono
North Jersey
"Blend in with the crowd and not stand out..." Isn't that kind of what John said a little while back about having the blue dots in his tail lights.. LOL
