I just noticed that...
 
Notifications
Clear all

I just noticed that I am considered a "Trusted Member". Three stars. Kind of a poke in the eye since I was one of the original members in 1996.

12 Posts
8 Users
6 Reactions
656 Views
Frank Kocour
(@kocour)
Noble Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 911
Topic starter  

What is the rating system based on?



   
Quote
Ed Glorius
(@ed-glorius)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 2597
 

Good question! For some reason I'm estimable!


Retired in Dunedin, Florida.


   
ReplyQuote
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 9615
 

The rating system is based on the amount of posts. 


John Bono
North Jersey


   
ReplyQuote
Bob Kroupa
(@2bubbas)
Estimable Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 109
 

OK-  posted to see what I am!



   
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 21318
 

Frank; I think the reason they started from scratch with the ratings was because you've been contributing so long there would be no stars left for us relative newbies. There should be a crown designation for you and a few others IMHO.  Wink  



   
ReplyQuote
cadillaclloyd
(@lloyd-mecca)
Noble Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 493
 

It indicates I am a recent member, but been on since at least 2000. If not 1998 or 9.



   
ReplyQuote
John Kuvakas
(@jkuvakas)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 9649
 

Sorry guys. There was no way to carry the previous status over. We all started out on a level playing field. 


John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA


   
ReplyQuote
cadillaclloyd
(@lloyd-mecca)
Noble Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 493
 

John,

I think if you look 6 posts up, John Bono's post indicates he joined 24 years ago.

 



   
ReplyQuote
John Kuvakas
(@jkuvakas)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 9649
 

Yes, some of the membership data ported over with inaccurate data. The problem was that the fields in the old site and the dating nomenclatures did not harmonize with the fields in the new site. Several fields on the old site were improperly populated and a few guys show up on the new site with a longer tenure than they should. The rest of us, including me, show our time from the moment we registered with the new site. It was a programing glitch they couldn't resolve.


John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA


   
ReplyQuote
(@Anonymous 197205242)
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 5402
 

John, there are actually two of me in the Members List. The one that is active and able to post here right now, and the original one that we couldn't activate successfully and which shows a Joined Date of 12/31/1996 which is actually about 5 years before I joined here in 2001 or so. Perhaps that second one should be removed by the Staff ? 



   
ReplyQuote
Frank Kocour
(@kocour)
Noble Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 911
Topic starter  

@jack-dodds LOL.  Thanks, I needed that.



   
ReplyQuote
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 9615
 
Posted by: @lloyd-mecca

John,

I think if you look 6 posts up, John Bono's post indicates he joined 24 years ago.

 

And that's spot on. I joined in 1997.

 


John Bono
North Jersey


   
ReplyQuote
Share: