The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1997
Diecast Collector Forums
Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.
Lol.
‘69
'69 without a doubt.
Can't pick just one, I like them both.
I think Merle could probably afford both choices using pocket change.
George, what is it about the 69 that puts you off? I'm not being critical here as of course its your opinion, but I am curious. I was stunned by this car's beauty when I first saw it and still feel that way all these years later. I drove one a fair bit, including a trip from Arizona to Canada and loved its comfort and performance as well.
The classic 1956
But will you still feed it when its 64..$$$$.?
Tough one. Gotta go with the '56 although that '69 is a beauty, too.
Umm, that's up for debate..Gas is now over $3 a gallon. How was the MPG for that Continental ?
And Jack, kudos to you for getting that tie-in. BTW, were you a 'smart alec' in high school ?
Never made it that far. Does it show?
Great on the open highway......less so in town!!!
My thinking too!
John Bono
North Jersey
I say balonga..or baloney..you're much too sharply witted..huh..does that make sense..lol