The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1997
Diecast Collector Forums
Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.
'49 Ford or Mercury?
Be sure to make your selection.
Of course, please “Reply” to share your comments.
If selection is greater than 2 rank them.
Click on the picture to enlarge the image.
John Bono
North Jersey
Mercury here too. I love both, but it really has substance.
Retired in Dunedin, Florida.
I just went with a tie. Two of my favorite Ford products from the late 40's.
As far as looks go I just can't pick one over the other; they are both awesome. I will give the nod however to the Mercury by a nose because of the Ford QC issues in '49.
Didn't care for the Ford until '51[Grill & tail lights]. So, today it is Mercury please. And I do prefer the '51 Mercury rear view over the '49 - '50. '49 - '50 I would have bought the Hudson but, '51 would have been either the Ford or the Mercury.
Been there, done that...don't you hate when that happens???Agggrrrhhh - the caption on the net said '49 and so did the article with it.@perrone1 That rear view is of a 51.
This is better, there's those 49 taillights! - thanks Bob!
John Bono
North Jersey
Yes sir - absolutely! Should have recognized the tail lights though. D'OH!Been there, done that...don't you hate when that happens???Agggrrrhhh - the caption on the net said '49 and so did the article with it.@perrone1 That rear view is of a 51.
This is better, there's those 49 taillights! - thanks Bob!
Hard choice and I do like both. I went with the Ford for a somewhat nimbler look and a sympathy for the underdog.
@perrone1 I much prefer the grille and tail light design of the '49 to that of the '51.






