'54 Buick or Hudson?
Be sure to make your selection.
Of course, please “Reply” to share your comments.
If selection is greater than 2 rank them.
Click on the picture to enlarge the image.
John Bono
North Jersey
Buick, especially your stunning example!
You're at the pinnacle of your game today, my dear friend!!
That Hudson is a favorite; one of the sweetest looking cars of the early fifties I have ever seen. I do have a minor issue with the oversized windshield header though.
The Buick, on the other hand, is classy, sporty and sophisticated, all at once.
My vote - the Roadmaster!!
I voted a tie. I like both. The Hudson looks a little behind the times. Sort of resembles Fords from previous years but I like it. The Buick looks good also.
Buick for me too. The 1954 redesign fires on all cylinders.
Retired in Dunedin, Florida.
Hudson please, their last good year. I just don't like Buicks.
Buick in it's all new look for 1954.
I much prefer the '53 version of both these cars. Today I voted for the Buick; the nose of the Hudson looks quite plain in comparison. Love the color of the Buick; it really suits it.
No Contest! THE BUICK!
Sadly, by '54 the Hudson had become a shell of its once classic styling and looked like a Ford clone this year. While the Buick was all new, all beautiful.
I think that next to the '59 Buick, the '54 is the best looking Buick of the fifties decade.
George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota
I picked Buick. I just never really got into the Hudson models.
Both are gorgeous automobiles, although I might have picked the 1954 Buick due to it's V-8 engine....... even though the Hudson might have a 6-cylinder Twin-H power motor under the hood.


