Poll: Which Oldsmob...
 
Notifications
Clear all
Poll results: '63, '64 or '65 Oldsmobile?
Voter(s): 17
Poll is closed Aug 18, 2023
'63 Oldsmobile  -  votes: 4 / 23.5%
4
23.5%
'64 Oldsmobile  -  votes: 6 / 35.3%
6
35.3%
'65 Oldsmobile  -  votes: 6 / 35.3%
6
35.3%
Tie  -  votes: 0 / 0%
0
0%
Sorry, no interest in this selection.  -  votes: 1 / 5.9%
1
5.9%

Poll: Which Oldsmobile? (8/4/2023)

11 Posts
9 Users
35 Reactions
1,235 Views
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 9678
Topic starter  

'63, '64 or '65 Oldsmobile?

Be sure to make your selection.

Of course, please “Reply” to share your comments.

If selection is greater than 2 rank them.

 

Click on the picture to enlarge the image.

1963 Oldsmobile Starfire Convertible 2
1964 Oldsmobile Starfire Convertible 1
1965 Oldsmobile Starfire Convertible 1a

John Bono
North Jersey


   
John Kuvakas, Steve Jacobs, George Schire and 3 people reacted
Quote
Topic Tags
Ed Glorius
(@ed-glorius)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 2613
 

I'll take the 1965 with its kicked-up rear fenders. Tie for the other two.


Retired in Dunedin, Florida.


   
John Kuvakas, Steve Jacobs, John Bono and 1 people reacted
ReplyQuote
David Green
(@david-green)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 9795
 

It would be a tie for me except that I prefer the full wheel opening for 1965, like Ed.



   
John Kuvakas, Steve Jacobs, John Bono and 1 people reacted
ReplyQuote
John Napoli
(@carsman1958)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 3991
 

I'm with the other guys as well.  The 65 stands out!



   
ReplyQuote
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7281
 
Posted by: @david-green

It would be a tie for me except that I prefer the full wheel opening for 1965, like Ed.

I've never understood what the attraction is to a full open wheel well.  Like on today's cars, all we see is wheels and some of the undercarriage of the car.  Not interesting to my eyes.  I liked it when fenders went over the wheels and some styling to them.  Just me, I guess.  Smile


George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
John Kuvakas, John Bono, Steve Jacobs and 1 people reacted
ReplyQuote
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7281
 

OLDSMOBILE'S, now we're talking! 

I like them all of course, and in the order that they are. 

From 1962 through the very early 1970's, Oldsmobile rocked in the styling department, at least for my taste!  And all through the 1950's too, up to 1959, then they had a couple of down years with their '60 and '61, but got back on track after that.  


George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
ReplyQuote
Brush
(@brush)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 2941
 

Full-size Olds for me is the '62. '63, '57, '64 the rest do not interest me.  So for this thread I choose the '63.  Just don't care for GMC divisions after '64.                                                                                      



   
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 21408
 

They are all very nice but I prefer the grille and tail end treatment of the '64 by a narrow margin over the '65.  The comparatively rather chunky '63 is third.



   
Pete Rovero, John Kuvakas, John Bono and 1 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7914
 
Posted by: @ed-glorius

I'll take the 1965 with its kicked-up rear fenders. Tie for the other two.

+1 as those are my choices also. 

Steve 



   
ReplyQuote
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 9678
Topic starter  

The '63 is overdone and the '65 appears to have too much bulk, it just doesn't flow. These two are in a tie for last place. The '64 is the clear winner with its clean and refined styling.


John Bono
North Jersey


   
ReplyQuote
Charles Rockett
(@charles-rockett)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 2381
 

Not an easy one. I've always liked the silvered band along the length of the '63 and the way its tailfin brightwork, transects the tail light. However the curious diagonal creasing over the headlamp I've found disconcerting. The '64, whilst not as interesting sculpture-wise I find happier, overall.

'65 is a more modern and a very pleasing design, however we go back to the diagonal creasing again - both ends - so I'll stick to 1964 for a peaceful life : )

Finally, looking at John's pictures, I see for the first time something of the '61 Lincoln, in the fenders of the '64 Starfire. Or maybe I need a trip to the optician?



   
Jack Dodds reacted
ReplyQuote
Share: