The ALL NEW 1962 ME...
 
Notifications
Clear all

The ALL NEW 1962 MERCURY at a DEALER NEAR YOU!

11 Posts
8 Users
28 Reactions
2,408 Views
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7214
Topic starter  

I have a MERCURY section on a wall in my garage, these are my Ad examples of Mercury's 1962 offerings.  I've always been sad that they no longer had their own individual styling, they were back to looking like Ford's.  But, I actually like their styling better than Ford's for '62.  

62 MERCURY MONTERAY #2 (2018 05 25 20 19 06 UTC)
62 MERCURY MONTERAY #1 (2018 05 25 20 19 06 UTC)
62 MERCURY #1 (2018 05 25 20 19 06 UTC)
62 MERCURY COMET #2 (2018 05 25 20 19 06 UTC)
62 MERCURY METEOR #1 (2018 05 25 20 19 06 UTC)

George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
Quote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 20708
 

I much prefer the 61 and 63 full size Mercurys to the 62, which I like well enough.  The mid size Meteor for 62 is really a nice little car.



   
ReplyQuote
(@moe-parr)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 2325
 

@jack-dodds

Funny how times and perspectives have changed; that nice "little" 1962 Meteor was 203.8" long, while my 2020 Dodge Charger, a large car by today's standards (the EPA says so), is 198.4" long.


This post was modified 5 years ago 3 times by Moe Parr

Barry Levittan
Long Island, NY


   
George Schire, John Kuvakas, John Merritt and 3 people reacted
ReplyQuote
Brush
(@brush)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 2858
 

Liked the car but, just could not get used to the tail light arrangement.  By the flyer it would seem they were most proud of the rear design.



   
ReplyQuote
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 9234
 
Posted by: @moe-parr

@jack-dodds

Funny how times and perspectives have changed; that nice "little" 1962 Meteor was 203.8" long, while my 2020 Dodge Charger, a large car by today's standards (the EPA says so), is 198.4" long.

I know what you mean. I attended a car show a couple of years back and I couldn't believe how big a '65 Impala appeared. It was very similar to the car I had and drove for 5 years.


John Bono
North Jersey


   
ReplyQuote
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 9234
 

This generation of Mercury was never a contender in my book.


John Bono
North Jersey


   
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 20708
 

@moe-parr  Hahaha......yes you are quite right; our perspectives sure have changed over the years.  This is especially reinforced when a person views vintage Caddys and Lincolns at car shows; how did we ever drive them around town and park them??  Lol.



   
ReplyQuote
John Kuvakas
(@jkuvakas)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 9530
 

@moe-parr, You're right! And...your Mopar has more room!


John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA


   
ReplyQuote
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7214
Topic starter  
Posted by: @sizedoesmatter

This generation of Mercury was never a contender in my book.

I liked them, but my problem was they looked to much like Ford's.  I liked it better when Ford, Mercury, and Lincoln all had their own identities.  That was more of a reason to buy one of them over the other.  

And as long as the parent company got the sale, it was a "win-win" for them and the buyer.  

 


George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
John Bono and John Bono reacted
ReplyQuote
Mark Lampariello
(@mark-lampariello)
Prominent Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 375
 

@moe-parr But i'll bet the Charger out weighs that Meteor by 500 pounds and is far far sturdier. People think that 'old' cars ['60s-70s]  were such heavy behemoths but few topped 2 tons. 

And I'll bet that Charger is waay more fun to drive!

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@bob-jackman)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 14741
 

I own three old cars that each weigh over 4,000 pounds...55 Imperial,63 Thunderbird Sports Roadster and a 1979 Continental Mark V.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: