'48 Mercury or Nash?
Be sure to make your selection.
Of course, please “Reply” to share your comments.
If selection is greater than 2 rank them.
Click on the picture to enlarge the image.
John Bono
North Jersey
Mercury gets the nod by a slim margin for its more aggressive look, plus its trim and drive train superiority. I really like the Nash though; especially in this rare convertible form.
That Nash is just different/gorgeous enough, for my vote. But if spoken for, I'll gladly accept the Merc!!
Two beautiful vehicles. I have a slight preference for the Nashand would love it even more if it was painted the same as the Mercury.
I gave the nod to the Merc this time. 👀👍
Frank Reed
Chesapeake, VA
Nash for me based on its looks and color.
Retired in Dunedin, Florida.
John Bono
North Jersey
No interest in these two.
I deliberately excluded the Hudson since it usually steals the show.
Smart man. (And so dang good lookin' too!!)
Love the Mercury, but I voted for the Nash for its cleaner style.
John Bono
North Jersey
For me, '48 was a tough year, style-wise. The market was going nuts; makers were having a hard time keeping up with demand, and it seems to me that design took a back seat. I find the front-end clips on many of the cars made that year (and in '49) to be a bit overwrought, as if they were trying too hard to make something new without spending too many resources. This explains much of why the early bathtub designs became popular. They were new and fresh and totally different from anything else. From my perspective, I never cared much for the bathtub designs, any of them. But I get their allure and acknowledge their place in design history. They broke the molds of the late thirties and early forties.
John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA


