'51 Hudson or Mercury?
Be sure to make your selection.
Of course, please “Reply” to share your comments.
If selection is greater than 2 rank them.
Click on the picture to enlarge the image.
John Bono
North Jersey
I voted Hudson, beautiful lines nose to tail.
Frank Reed
Chesapeake, VA
Both are very nice cars but in convertible form I prefer the Mercury. The thick windshield header of the Hudson just doesn't look attractive to me. If they were both coupes, Hudson would win.
I like both but I prefer the Hudson more overall. Love to try either one.
I don't like to vote "Tie". But in this instance, even with a loaded gun to my temple and the holder of the gun saying he will shoot if I don't "pick one" over the other, he'll have to shoot me, because I can't pick one over the other.
I LOVE BOTH! For 1949 through 1951, I've always been in love with the styling of the Hudson's and Mercury's. So it's a TIE.
George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota
Both beautifully styled cars,unlike JD l find the heavy windshield header on the Hudson to be unique and attractive…..
Both beautiful, but I think the Step-down Hudson is one of the all-time great designs so it gets my vote.
Barry Levittan
Long Island, NY
Love the '48 - '54 Hudson. Like the '49 - '51 Mercury. Voted tie, don't care for the over sized roof-windshield header on the Hudson either.
I voted for the Mercury. It has a discreet sculptured look that I like. Like the Hudson too but not fond of the thick windshield header.
Like both but the 49-51 Mercuries are some of my all -time favorite cars.
Like both but the 49-51 Mercuries are some of my all -time favorite cars.
+1
John Bono
North Jersey

