The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1997
Diecast Collector Forums
Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.
8Forums
195,000+Topics
1,276,000+Posts
10,000+Members
1997Research From
Notifications
Clear all
The Lounge
20
Posts
14
Users
38
Reactions
4,584
Views
05/08/2023 2:06 pm
For me luxury = Cadillac. The imperial and Lincoln are beautiful too and close behind. I could never understand the taillight placement on the Imperial.
Very odd. Also the tail lights - and headlights - '61 / '62
John Bono reacted
05/08/2023 2:31 pm
For me luxury = Cadillac. The imperial and Lincoln are beautiful too and close behind. I could never understand the taillight placement on the Imperial.
I think they were meant to echo styling of years past when lights, both head and tail, were not integrated into the fenders.
Barry Levittan
Long Island, NY
Topic starter
05/08/2023 2:33 pm
@charles-rockett Charles, could be the stylists thought if we got away with the unusual taillight placement for '55 and '56 why not go all out and add the headlights too for the '61 and '62? 
John Bono
North Jersey
Charles Rockett reacted
05/08/2023 2:59 pm
@sizedoesmatter I'm sure you're right, John. If at first you don't succeed ... etc.
John Bono reacted
Page 2 / 2
Prev