The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1997
Diecast Collector Forums
Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.
All cars deserve a "look at me" beneath the spotlight, even if the vast majority dislike it.
“Everybody to their taste,” said the old lady as she kissed the cow’s derriere.
Well said. And even though I wouldn't consider either of these cars to buy, I certainly can appreciate how much money and love has gone into both of them. Beats the devil out of the cars we see in Pete's Derelict Derby that we all also love so much as John's 'Which?'
GM's '58s were generally an exercise in bloated excess. I am not a big fan of those cars but I never fail to acknowledge the sheer volume of chrome and stainless they carried, especially when viewing one in person. Buick's Limited was a huge car and the production numbers for the convertible were less than 900 (a very small number for GM) so I gave it the nod today for both its rarity and audacity.
Side trim on the Buick goes in all directions…15 chrome slash marks on each side and more chrome covering the fender behind the rear tire is just too much; the Olds side trim at least all heads the same direction. I like the drive train better too.
David Vandermeer
Corinth, Texas
Both are excessive, and that's how it was with GM in 1958. I prefer the Buick over the Oldsmobile.
Gents, thanks for your replies.
John Bono
North Jersey
I like each of these "GM Five For Fifty-Eight" automobiles. I have replicas of the Buick, Cadillac and Pontiac General Motors cars for that year. The are extravagant and unmistakable cars or models !
@michaeldetorrice Agreed, I have the Chevy, Pontiac and Cadillac in 1/24 for '58. I love all 3.😊
The Buick is awesome! All that chrome! All that excessive extravagance! That car makes a grand statement. I absolutely love it 😍
John Merritt
South Lyon, Michigan - USA