poll: Which '67? (8...
 
Notifications
Clear all
Poll results: '67 Dodge or Mercury?
Voter(s): 19
Poll is closed Aug 15, 2024
'67 Dodge  -  votes: 10 / 52.6%
10
52.6%
'67 Mercury  -  votes: 7 / 36.8%
7
36.8%
Tie  -  votes: 1 / 5.3%
1
5.3%
Sorry, no interest in this selection.  -  votes: 1 / 5.3%
1
5.3%

poll: Which '67? (8/1/2024)

22 Posts
12 Users
73 Reactions
2,758 Views
John Kuvakas
(@jkuvakas)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 9653
 

They moved the Marlin to the Ambassador platform in 1967. IMO, this remedied the rather awkward proportions of the original. I like the look of the '67. But it was too little too late. 

1965

40110193452 9b4a6c17fb b

1967

31UuNp 2pUL

John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA


   
ReplyQuote
David Green
(@david-green)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 9795
 

I'm more of a Mercury Cyclone fan here. That Charger was more popular with my friends back then.



   
ReplyQuote
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 9678
Topic starter  
Posted by: @jkuvakas

They moved the Marlin to the Ambassador platform in 1967. IMO, this remedied the rather awkward proportions of the original. I like the look of the '67. But it was too little too late. 

1965

40110193452 9b4a6c17fb b

1967

31UuNp 2pUL

Agree!


John Bono
North Jersey


   
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 21408
 
Posted by: @brush

@jkuvakas as administrator:

Are you saying we should be choosing the pictures only?  I HAVE BEEN DOING THIS ALL WRONG. Up until now I judge the make & model, the color or the wheels or add ons or drive trains have made no difference.  I have said this before and nobody correted me, we are supposed to be judging the pictures, OK.

Bruce; my recollection of previous discussion/comments on this point is simply that there are no rules/guidelines; an individual votes on how they feel about the cars.  Obviously this could mean anything from the body style/color/drive train/factory options, etcetera indicated in the pics to personal experience.  Personally I tend to vote for the car being considered based on my observations and recollections of it over the years and I mostly use the pictures provided to prompt such thoughts.  In other words....do whatever process you want to arrive at your decision.  Just one person's opinion.



   
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 21408
 
Posted by: @sizedoesmatter
Posted by: @jkuvakas

They moved the Marlin to the Ambassador platform in 1967. IMO, this remedied the rather awkward proportions of the original. I like the look of the '67. But it was too little too late. 

1965

40110193452 9b4a6c17fb b

1967

31UuNp 2pUL

Agree!

I agree as well.  This is why IMHO the 1st. gen Charger sits on the right platform for its design, as did the attractive '67 Marlin vs. the comparatively hunched '65.  I remember being absolutely blown away when I first saw this Charger design; it was radical and aggressive looking and the awesome interior sealed the deal for me.  However, like many others I was also blown away by the new '68 Charger design (and still am) so my focus changed and the original Charger design became somewhat of a quickly dated looking styling "blip" in automotive history.  I still love this car though and would be proud to own one.



   
ReplyQuote
John Kuvakas
(@jkuvakas)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 9653
 

@Brush, No, I'm just saying that's how I pick mine. One of the great things about John's comparos is that there are no rules!


John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA


   
Tony Perrone, Brush, Jack Dodds and 1 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 9678
Topic starter  

I'm going with the Charger but I like the Cyclone too.


John Bono
North Jersey


   
Jack Dodds reacted
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2
Share: