1968 Chrysler Sprin...
 
Notifications
Clear all

1968 Chrysler Spring Special

13 Posts
9 Users
31 Reactions
889 Views
John Kuvakas
(@jkuvakas)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 9693
Topic starter  
349188029 281235824349825 2988662922745972790 n

John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA


   
Pete Rovero, David Green, Steve Jacobs and 4 people reacted
Quote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10620
 

The "fuselage styling"  of these big Chryslers clearly lends itself to such ornamentation; all this wood looks great. Mercury also marketed "wood-sided"  convertibles but with less success.



   
ReplyQuote
Brush
(@brush)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 2962
 

Wood on a steel bodied car looks ridiculous to me.  Is an insult, since you know it is not needed or real. And I do prefer

mono colored cars.

maxresdefault

At least it is real wood.



   
Steve Jacobs reacted
ReplyQuote
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 9859
 

I'm ok with "wood" trimmed wagons, but not a fan of "wood" trimmed convertibles.


John Bono
North Jersey


   
John Kuvakas reacted
ReplyQuote
TerrySlekar
(@terryslekar)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1529
 
Posted by: @chris

The "fuselage styling"  of these big Chryslers clearly lends itself to such ornamentation; all this wood looks great. Mercury also marketed "wood-sided"  convertibles but with less success.

Actually, the “fuselage” years were ‘69 thru ‘73…


Zeeky Banutski
The People’s Republic of Maryland


   
John Kuvakas reacted
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10620
 

One of the most controversial woody-convertibles of all time.....   The 1955 Lincoln Sportsman.

Lin 55 Wood 3
Lin 55 Wood 2
Lin 55 Wood 1


   
ReplyQuote
(@chris)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 10620
 
Posted by: @terryslekar
Posted by: @chris

The "fuselage styling"  of these big Chryslers clearly lends itself to such ornamentation; all this wood looks great. Mercury also marketed "wood-sided"  convertibles but with less success.

Actually, the “fuselage” years were ‘69 thru ‘73…

Yes, you are correct. After I posted that (I know better!  🙄) .... I realized I was mistaken. Thanks!



   
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 8140
 
Posted by: @brush

Wood on a steel bodied car looks ridiculous to me.  Is an insult, since you know it is not needed or real. And I do prefer

mono colored cars.

maxresdefault

At least it is real wood.

I hope the owner's not a smoker !



   
John Kuvakas reacted
ReplyQuote
Graeme Ogg
(@graeme-ogg)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 2040
 
Posted by: @chris

One of the most controversial woody-convertibles of all time.....   The 1955 Lincoln Sportsman.

Lin 55 Wood 3
Lin 55 Wood 2
Lin 55 Wood 1

American car stylists of the 50s famously tried to imitate the look of jet fighters, but not many tried to imitate the structural details of a Lancaster bomber. Shame they didn't make a proper job of it and cover the hood and lower rear flanks as well.

Lancaster

Graeme.M. Ogg
London U.K.


   
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 21544
 
Posted by: @chris

The "fuselage styling"  of these big Chryslers clearly lends itself to such ornamentation; all this wood looks great. Mercury also marketed "wood-sided"  convertibles but with less success.

image


   
Pete Rovero, Steve Jacobs, John Kuvakas and 1 people reacted
ReplyQuote
John Kuvakas
(@jkuvakas)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 9693
Topic starter  

I'm not even sure of Chrysler's offering was "successful." On the wagons, certainly.


John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA


   
Steve Jacobs reacted
ReplyQuote
(@moe-parr)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 2353
 

Love these "land yachts"...great post, thanks John!


Barry Levittan
Long Island, NY


   
ReplyQuote
TerrySlekar
(@terryslekar)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1529
 

I’ll go to my grave calling it “a picture of wood”.


Zeeky Banutski
The People’s Republic of Maryland


   
Steve Jacobs reacted
ReplyQuote
Share: