'61, '62 or '63 Chrysler?
Be sure to make your selection.
Of course, please “Reply” to share your comments.
If selection is greater than 2 rank them.
Click on the picture to enlarge the image.
John Bono
North Jersey
1) '61 2) '62 3) '63. Yes, just in the order they appeared.
Actually, at any given moment if I'm asked, I like all three equally. Ironically, I owned a '63 Hardtop and it was absolutely one of the smoothest riding cars I've ever driven.
With regard to Chrysler's in general, from 1955 through 1964, to my eyes they were some of the most beautiful cars of any from the Big Three.
After '65, I think Chrysler lost their styling direction.
George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota
62, 61 63. I like the tail light treatment of the 62 more than the 61 and the 63 doesn’t move me at all. 🥹
Frank Reed
Chesapeake, VA
Like JK, chronological order. 1961 goes big with its looks, and the 300 was being neutered after it.
Retired in Dunedin, Florida.
1961, 1962 and then 1963 for me also. Thanks John.
My favorite Chrysler the '62 please. '62 beautiful, '61 nice, '63 great car, just don't care for the styling.
I much prefer the look of the '62 tail end. The '61 places second and the comparatively mundane looking '63 third.
I much prefer the look of the '62 tail end. The '61 places second and the comparatively mundane looking '63 third.
My feelings exactly.
Barry Levittan
Long Island, NY
#1 = ‘61, #2 = ‘63…’62 = butt ugly (the rear end is obnoxious)…
Zeeky Banutski
The People’s Republic of Maryland


