The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1997
Diecast Collector Forums
Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.
8Forums
195,000+Topics
1,276,000+Posts
10,000+Members
1997Research From
Notifications
Clear all
The Lounge
23
Posts
18
Users
132
Reactions
1,422
Views
Topic starter
15/03/2026 11:04 pm
'69, '70 or '71 Ford Mustang?
Be sure to make your selection.
Of course, please “Reply” to share your comments.
If selection is greater than 2 rank them.
Click on the picture to enlarge the image.
John Bono
North Jersey
16/03/2026 1:16 am
Pretty much one of the easiest for me so far! How could anyone NOT choose the ‘69?
16/03/2026 4:58 am
I agree with the 69. The lesser of the evils. Now give me a 68 and maybe we can talk.
16/03/2026 5:16 am
The ‘69. My favorite Mustang year. Then the 71, 70.
John Merritt
South Lyon, Michigan - USA
16/03/2026 5:55 am
By a scoop; a side scoop: 1969.
16/03/2026 6:41 am
Of these 3, 1969. Depending on trim, 1969 and 1970 would tie or go back and forth. A Boss 302 of either year would definitely tie.
1971 third.
This post was modified 7 months ago by Ed Glorius
Retired in Dunedin, Florida.
16/03/2026 8:09 am
A tie between the 69 and 70. 71 definitely last.
16/03/2026 8:21 am
The '69 Mach I gets the easy nod today....just a beautiful car. 71 then 70 for second and third place; but if they were Boss 302s then it would be reversed.
16/03/2026 8:21 am
Mustangs, I only love one, the '69 Boss 429.
Mustang to me:
1. '69 love
2. '68 like
3. '70 like
4. '67 all right
5+. '64 to '66 are just glorified Falcons
8+. '71 up yuck
16/03/2026 8:49 am
71 for me, followed by the 69 and then the 70. The 67 & 68 to me are the best in the range of 64-71.
16/03/2026 9:27 am
In order or year starting with 1969. I would have preferred earlier Mustangs to those shown here, the lighter the better.
16/03/2026 10:42 am
I love them all. But the 69 slightly better
16/03/2026 12:17 pm
None of the above, but the 1964.5 was a great car, if you added a four-barrel to the 289, with a four-speed. Rode in a couple of them, when I was fourteen, including one Saturday afternoon, when Dave R''s girlfriend took me with her to run an errand and a couple of lads in a '55 Chevy pulled alongside on a straight road, which is when she showed them she wasn't just a very pretty face. One of the few girls I ever knew who could expertly work her way through the gears like a pro, both 'up the hill and down again.' Dave's car was burgundy, and dressed with the same rims as this ride:
Page 1 / 2
Next