The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1997

Diecast Collector Forums

Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.

8Forums
195,000+Topics
1,276,000+Posts
10,000+Members
1997Research From

Poll: Which Plymout...
 
Notifications
Clear all
Poll results: '60, '61 or '62 Plymouth?
Voter(s): 24
Poll is closed Aug 17, 2026
'60 Plymouth  -  votes: 3 / 12.5%
3
12.5%
'61 Plymouth  -  votes: 10 / 41.7%
10
41.7%
'62 Plymouth  -  votes: 5 / 20.8%
5
20.8%
Tie  -  votes: 3 / 12.5%
3
12.5%
Sorry, no interest in this selection.  -  votes: 3 / 12.5%
3
12.5%

Poll: Which Plymouth? (8/4/2026)

19 Posts
17 Users
127 Reactions
1,349 Views
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 33237
Topic starter  

'60, '61 or '62 Plymouth?

Be sure to make your selection.

Of course, please “Reply” to share your comments.

If selection is greater than 2 rank them.

 

Click on the picture to enlarge the image.

1960 Plymouth Fury 2dr ht 9a
1961 Plymouth Fury 2 door hard Top 11a
1962 Plymouth Sport Fury 2dr ht 6

 


John Bono
North Jersey


   
John Napoli, David Green, Geno and 3 people reacted
Quote
Topic Tags
(@moe-parr)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 5597
 

John, this one proves that you are a master at this! You found 3 consecutive "oddball" styling years for Plymouth which makes this a really fun choice today!

I find the '60's fins way "over the top" (almost literally) and it hurts my eyes to even look at the '62 so that makes the "interesting" (to put it kindly) looking '61 the winner for me today. 

Fabulous job today, John, I loved it! 👏 


Barry Levittan
Long Island, NY


   
grockwood, Brush, John Kuvakas and 7 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@pete-rovero)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 5133
 

I agree with Barry on this poll John and I've come to the same conclusion:  1961.  Thanks for a most unique and thought-provoking comparison.



   
grockwood, John Kuvakas, John Napoli and 5 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@100ford2003)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 12887
 

Wow John, what the heck have you been drinking…😂  I’m going with the ‘60 because it’s so different from every other ‘60 that I can remember! !  I’ll relegate the other two to a tie 👍. 🙌 

steve



   
Brush, John Kuvakas, John Napoli and 4 people reacted
ReplyQuote
Geoff Jowett
(@geoff-jowett)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 8355
 

love the face on the 61. Anyone else see the resemblance?

image

 



   
Steve Jacobs, John Kuvakas, Pete Rovero and 5 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@perrone1)
Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 24957
 

Posted by: @geoff-jowett

love the face on the 61. Anyone else see the resemblance?

image

 

Oh yes; I do too. I also see it in the Lexus LS:

Screenshot 2026 08 04 060830

 



   
Geoff Jowett, Steve Jacobs, Brush and 5 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@perrone1)
Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 24957
 

While if the circumstances were to align, I could see myself owning any of the three, it would be an extraordinary situation because I don't care for any of them - equally. My very first: No Interest.



   
Steve Jacobs, Brush, John Kuvakas and 4 people reacted
ReplyQuote
Ed Glorius
(@ed-glorius)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 6093
 

1961 because it's a crazy spaceship. 1962 next because it's smaller.


Retired in Dunedin, Florida.


   
Geoff Jowett, Steve Jacobs, Brush and 5 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@michaeldetorrice)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2719
 

I had a 1/25 promo of the 1961 Plymouth and at about that time, Plymouth was a client of my Dad's. I have a couple of prized SunStar 1/18 diecasts of the beautiful 1960 Plymouth at the twilight of the fin era. I thought the originally planned and Exner-styled 1962 full-size Plymouths were terrific-looking cars. I thought the downsizing that they suffered through due to management interference was unfortunate and many car buyers agreed. 



   
Geoff Jowett, Steve Jacobs, John Kuvakas and 4 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@bob-jackman)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 27044
 

@pete-rovero Another agreement with Barry. Lexus designers must have agreed also as they were obviously influenced by the grill. 61 then 62 and 60.



   
Geoff Jowett, Steve Jacobs, Brush and 6 people reacted
ReplyQuote
Brush
(@brush)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 13753
 

All three are butt ugly, the last decent looking Plymouth was the '56 model and it took until '65 to make a decent looking car. Plymouth '57 thru '63 were just plain ugly looking to me. '64 was all right and '65 was good. 

Today no interest


This post was modified 2 months ago by Brush

   
Geoff Jowett, Steve Jacobs, Tony Perrone and 3 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@jmullinax)
Reputable Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 109
 

1960 - Way overdone for my taste

1961 - A little too odd (just in a general sort of way)

1962 - The winner!



   
Steve Jacobs, John Kuvakas, Tony Perrone and 3 people reacted
ReplyQuote
Geno
 Geno
(@geno)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 6443
 

I voted a tie, all 3 equally ugly. JMHO though. They hurt my eyes.😵🤢 But thanks John, I look forward to these every day.😁👍


This post was modified 2 months ago 2 times by Geno

   
Geoff Jowett, Steve Jacobs, Brush and 5 people reacted
ReplyQuote
David Green
(@david-green)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 10389
 

The ugly years. I would not want any of them but I chose a tie. They do create a talking point so I do have some interest.



   
Geno, Geoff Jowett, Steve Jacobs and 5 people reacted
ReplyQuote
John Napoli
(@carsman1958)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 4511
 

I went with the 61 for the cool shape.  Shame that you do not see many of these any more.



   
Geno, Geoff Jowett, grockwood and 4 people reacted
ReplyQuote
Page 1 / 2
Share: