Poll: Which Thunder...
 
Notifications
Clear all
Poll results: '60 or '61 T-bird?
Voter(s): 25
Poll is closed Jan 29, 2023
'60 T-Bird  -  votes: 11 / 44%
11
44%
'61 T-Bird  -  votes: 14 / 56%
14
56%
Tie  -  votes: 0 / 0%
0
0%
Sorry, no interest in this selection.  -  votes: 0 / 0%
0
0%

Poll: Which Thunderbird? (1/15/2023)

27 Posts
17 Users
64 Reactions
3,598 Views
John Merritt
(@jcarnutz)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 5496
 

Wonderful description John, what an amazing viewpoint. I never thought of the Thunderbird or the Continental in that way, but it fits so perfectly. 

The '61 gets my vote. 


John Merritt
South Lyon, Michigan - USA


   
ReplyQuote
(@moe-parr)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 2325
 

I don't mind being in the minority on this one...I vote for the '60.


Barry Levittan
Long Island, NY


   
ReplyQuote
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7282
 
Posted by: @jkuvakas

I liked the Square Birds. But the '61 Bird and its counterpart, the '61 Continental, set the styling standard for the sixties. It was understated classic elegance. Every line complements the other starting from the sleek bullet nose, that character line running along the shoulder of the car all the way to the back taillights running parallel to the accent just above the rocker panels. It lengthens the car and adds to the illusion of a finely honed instrument designed to cleave the air smoothly. There's just enough of a hood bulge with two sleek creases at each side to connote power as the shut line-free hood sweeps down smoothly into the grille with the contours mimicked at the side view. Standing on the sidewalk, watching one go by, was like seeing a rocketship cleaving the air and watching the afterburners fade into the distance. Car design went from huge and ostentatious in the late fifties to smooth and elegant, starting in 1961 and led by the T-Bird and the Continental. Ford took the rocketship themes of the fifties, refined them, and put good taste on display for the world to see. 

This is why America is great.  You can have your opinion and favorites and I can have mine.  And, we can still like each other because we love cars.  Everything you stated about the '61 T-Bird and '61 Lincoln, are exactly the reasons I don't like them. 

I was 9 years old when they debuted back in 1961, and I was honestly mortified at their unattractiveness...to my eyes anyway.  That dislike for their look and styling is the same today.  Just completely odd looking cars with absolutely no character at all. 

Hey John, the next rounds on me...two more beers please.  God bless you sir!  


George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
ReplyQuote
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 9380
Topic starter  

Two very beautiful but different cars. I'm going with the '60 because to me it appears more substantial.


John Bono
North Jersey


   
John Kuvakas reacted
ReplyQuote
Mark Lampariello
(@mark-lampariello)
Prominent Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 375
 

I like both but vote for  the '61.  Question: The early 60s Lincolns tend to be respected as clean and elegant, and whose designs redefined styling trends. Why so few models of them?



   
ReplyQuote
Dave_Larsen
(@dave_larsen)
Estimable Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 88
 

I like them both.   In person, I find them to be very appealing automobiles.   Today I give a slight edge to the '61.   I like the '62-'63 Sports Roadster versions even better, but those are not among today's choices.



   
ReplyQuote
(@pete-rovero)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1963
 

@mark-lampariello 

Quick answer:  Lincoln production was around 30K per year, and Cadillac outsold Lincoln nearly 5 to 1 in the early to mid-sixties.    One reason for this is that Cadillac had multiple models and series, while Lincoln only had two, 4-door sedan and 4-door convertible.  Also, Cadillacs were over $1,000 cheaper than Continentals.  



   
John Bono reacted
ReplyQuote
Brush
(@brush)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 2879
 

Thunderbirds in my taste;

'55 - '57 

'58 - '60

'64 - '66

Don't care for any of the others with one exception the ; '87 & '88 Turbo Coupe

1987 ford thunderbird 1561740170cd20849IMG 0577


   
ReplyQuote
(@pete-rovero)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1963
 

My '84 Turbo Coupe, replaced with the '90 Super Coupe.  

1984TBirdTurboCoupe
1990SuperCoupe


   
ReplyQuote
John Kuvakas
(@jkuvakas)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 9585
 

@pete-rovero, the Turbo Coupe was a great car. But, the Super Coupe was awesome. I ran a Ford dealership during that era and usually drove a Turbo Coupe in the summer. Equipped with a 5-speed, it was comfortable and entertaining. When they redesigned the T-Bird in '89, I ordered an Arctic White Super Coupe with a gray leather interior, 5-speed, and a 3.90 rear end. I was astonished by the leap in performance and handling. Neither car gets credit for how well sorted out they were and how great the interiors were.


John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA


   
John Bono reacted
ReplyQuote
(@pete-rovero)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1963
 

@jkuvakas I couldn't agree more.  I ordered my Turbo Coupe with a 5-speed.  It actually had more horsepower than the V8 Birds---145 vs 135, and over 30 mpg highway.  But the black/black leather SC was incredible.  Mine had the 4-speed overdrive automatic.  Very comfortable car with adjustable suspension, JBL audio, etc.  I added a computer chip and an underdrive pulley to the supercharger and got 30 more horsepower out of it, 215 to 245.  It sure had a nice whine to it under acceleration.



   
John Kuvakas reacted
ReplyQuote
Frank Reed
(@frank)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 3462
 

@pete-rovero I had an new 85 6 cyl black with grey cloth interior and a new 94 6 cyl both very good vehicles.

EB0B02D2 E4BD 4151 AF34 421C9A1DC10F

Frank Reed
Chesapeake, VA


   
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2
Share: