Rub-a-dub-dub, it's the Packard washtub for me. Bathe in luxury.🛀
For me, Packard, Nash, Hudson, Lincoln, then Mercury. A tough and interesting one, John.
If I rate them on true "BATH TUB" look, it goes like the: 1) NASH 2) PACKARD 3) HUDSON 4) LINCOLN 5) MERCURY.
But if I rate them from "Best Looking" to "Worst looking", it goes like this: 1) HUDSON 2) MERCURY 3) LINCOLN 4) NASH 5) PACARD.
WOW! Complete agreement with you George. Except for the spelling of Packard, ha ha.
I had "Packard" spelled correctly the first time I typed it, but left out the "k" in the second reference. I went back and corrected it. I hope that in time, the smear of "White Out" on my computer screen will rub off.
George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota
For me it's Packard, Mercury, Hudson, Nash, Lincoln.
Gents, thanks for the replies!
John Bono
North Jersey
Packard, Hudson, Lincoln, Mercury, Nash
John Merritt
South Lyon, Michigan - USA
Mercury wins this one easily, then Hudson, Packard, Nash, Lincoln.
All are great-looking examples of this style of automobile and I am happy to have replicas in various scales of most of the brands in this configuration.
All are great-looking examples of this style of automobile and I am happy to have replicas in various scales of most of the brands in this configuration.
I want to know why one of the Mints didn't give us an opulent Packard like this. Or one in two tone like this:
Yes, Tony, that is such a beauty and in such a classy color scheme !


