The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1994
Diecast Collector Forums
Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.
'65 Mercury or Oldsmobile?
Be sure to make your selection.
Of course, please “Reply” to share your comments.
If selection is greater than 2 rank them.
Click on the picture to enlarge the image.
John Bono
North Jersey
Mercury on this pairing John.
Mercury for me too. Love its looks.
Retired in Dunedin, Florida.
I am with David, Mercury for me. It wasn't until the 66 Olds came out that I started to look at them.
I like the rear of the Olds better and the interior of the Merc better. i vote Merc as it looks like a smaller, tighter package over all.
Owned both, but of a later year. Liked the Olds a lot - LOVED the Merc. Merc for me.
I'm with Bob!
John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA
OLDSMOBILE without any hesitation. Nicer roof-line, grill work is easier to look at, and it's cleaner looking without the chrome of the other car.
George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota
Another apples compared to oranges. The Olds is a mid-size while the Comet is a compact [Falcon], for '66 the Comet became a mid-size [Fairlane]. But I love the '65 Comet anyway.
Olds for me today...last year of the slim, trim look.
Barry Levittan
Long Island, NY
@moe-parr Like you Barry, I much prefer the crisper looking smaller early Olds Cutlass design.
Some see apples and oranges while I see two fine examples of 1965 American Muscle. I'm going with the 442 with its smooth and clean lines.
John Bono
North Jersey
Some see apples and oranges while I see two fine examples of 1965 American Muscle.
Me 2; though I went Mercury on the vote.





