Be sure to make your selection.
Of course, please “Reply” to share your comments.
If selection is greater than 2 rank them.
Click on the picture to enlarge the image.
’69 Mark III, no vinyl roof – The Lounge – The Diecast Zone Forums
click on the above link to see without.
John Bono
North Jersey
I also tend to dislike vinyl roofs, often used to give a fake "upmarket" air to common-or-garden cars. But looking at the pic above, I have to admit it does give this car a nice formal look, and the plain blue car looks kind of "stripped down" and bare without it.
I guess it's a bit like conti spare kits or rear wheel spats. Sometimes they enhance the look of a particular car, and sometimes they don't.
Graeme.M. Ogg
London U.K.
I voted tie because to me it all depends on the body color choice.
Steve
Love the Mark III, but the absence of the vinyl roof does not do the car justice. The formal roof line screams out for the vinyl roof. One would suspect the owner "cheaped out" just to save a few bucks.
John Bono
North Jersey
I may be proven wrong but the vinyl delete option didn't save any money. It was actually more expensive to do them w/o the rook as the roof hid some of the weld lines.
John Kuvakas
Warrenton, VA
WITHOUT, please. A vinyl roof does make a car more luxurious but, a true luxury cars does not need vinyl to look luxurious. I don't care for luxury cars any way, so if no vinyl looks cheaper I prefer it [what logic]. Would the word for the full luxury/vinyl topped car be opulent.
Love the Mark III, but the absence of the vinyl roof does not do the car justice. The formal roof line screams out for the vinyl roof.
May I echo these words!
Barry Levittan
Long Island, NY
