Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
11/08/2024 11:09 am
'48 Hudson or Nash?
Be sure to make your selection.
Of course, please “Reply” to share your comments.
If selection is greater than 2 rank them.
Click on the picture to enlarge the image.
John Bono
North Jersey
11/08/2024 11:29 am
Even though the Nash styling looks dated compared to the Hudson, there is something about the look of it that I have always liked; especially the coupe and convertible (below). I like the grille and tail end of the later Hudson more than this early version of the drop down design ('48 vs. '52 shown below).
11/08/2024 12:05 pm
Tough one here. Both are very desirable but today, I lean slightly to the Nash.
Tony Perrone and John Bono reacted
11/08/2024 12:42 pm
Hudson. It looks like the future, and it was, at least for a while.
Retired in Dunedin, Florida.
11/08/2024 1:06 pm
Step-down Hudson all the way. Few cars beat it, in styling or engineering, in its heyday!
Barry Levittan
Long Island, NY
Tony Perrone and John Bono reacted
11/08/2024 1:23 pm
They are both really attractive postwar automobiles. The colors are great and the Hudson scheme is amazing. I think my Dad drove a postwar 1:1 Nash for a while and I have a couple of Step-Down Hudsons in 1/43 and several coupes and convertibles in 1/18. All are favorites !
John Bono and Tony Perrone reacted
11/08/2024 1:50 pm
Going with the Hudson. 😎👍
Frank Reed
Chesapeake, VA
John Bono and Tony Perrone reacted
Topic starter
13/08/2024 8:23 am
John Bono
North Jersey
13/08/2024 5:05 pm
@sizedoesmatter Another vote for the Nash. If the vote was for the year before, it would be a tie.
14/08/2024 11:11 am
@bob-jackman "If the vote was for the year before, it would be a tie."
I agree Bob...these images show why....1947 Hudson vs. Nash
