The Diecast Zone · Model Car Club Since 1997

Diecast Collector Forums

Eight forums, every scale, and thirty years of shop talk — new arrivals, restorations, reviews, and the finds you won’t see posted anywhere else, with the full archive back to 2002 restored and searchable. Free to Register.

8Forums
195,000+Topics
1,276,000+Posts
10,000+Members
1997Research From

Poll: Which '56? (8...
 
Notifications
Clear all
Poll results: '56 Imperial or Packard?
Voter(s): 17
Poll is closed Aug 30, 2025
'56 Imperial  -  votes: 9 / 52.9%
9
52.9%
'56 Packard  -  votes: 8 / 47.1%
8
47.1%
Tie  -  votes: 0 / 0%
0
0%
Sorry, no interest in this selection.  -  votes: 0 / 0%
0
0%

Poll: Which '56? (8/16/2025)

12 Posts
11 Users
33 Reactions
861 Views
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 33273
Topic starter  

'56 Imperial or Packard?

Be sure to make your selection.

Of course, please “Reply” to share your comments.

If selection is greater than 2 rank them.

 

Click on the picture to enlarge the image.

1956 Imperial Coupe 11
1956 Packard 400 1a

John Bono
North Jersey


   
Quote
Ed Glorius
(@ed-glorius)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 6097
 

I surprised myself and went with the Packard.


Retired in Dunedin, Florida.


   
ReplyQuote
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 7280
 

Side by side, the Packard is an elephant compared to the smaller Imperial.  With but the exception of those warts on top of the rear fenders, the Imperial is more appealing to me.  So IMPERIAL it is!


George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
John Napoli reacted
ReplyQuote
(@perrone1)
Admin
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 25015
 

Posted by: @ed-glorius

I surprised myself and went with the Packard.

Exactly; me too!

 



   
ReplyQuote
David Green
(@david-green)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 10400
 

Packard all the way!



   
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 39618
 

The '55 and '56 Imperials are absolutely gorgeous cars and to my eye the unique tail lights enhance their look.  The Packard is very nice looking as well but IMHO is no match for the Imperial.



   
ReplyQuote
Graeme Ogg
(@graeme-ogg)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 4062
 

Packard, please.

I was a fan of the full-blooded "Forward Look" of the '57 Chrysler Corp cars so I find the style of the '55-'56 cars a bit disappointing and "old hat" by comparison (though I know some folks actually prefer them to the later big-finned look).

On that basis I rather prefer the styling of the Packard.

Incidentally, George S. described the Packard as an "elephant" compared with the "smaller" Imperial, and in the photos above it does look bigger and bulkier, but I did a quick check on dimensions:

Packard  - Length 215"   Width 78"   Height 62"

Imperial - Length 230"   Width 79"   Height 61"

Not that that is going to influence anyone's choice, I was just having a nerdy moment.


Graeme.M. Ogg
London U.K.


   
John Napoli, John Bono, Jack Dodds and 2 people reacted
ReplyQuote
Brush
(@brush)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 13756
 

Packard please. Friend had a '55 or '56 Imp, didn't care for it.



   
ReplyQuote
(@whodeytink)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 8321
 

Imperial for me!



   
ReplyQuote
(@bob-jackman)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 27074
 

Imperial of course.



   
ReplyQuote
(@moe-parr)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 5599
 

Packard stylists did an amazing job with the '55 - '56 restyle of a 5-year old body. They managed to make Packard's "swan song" look contemporary. But still no match for Chrysler Corp.'s initial "Forward Look" styling! Imperial for me.


Barry Levittan
Long Island, NY


   
ReplyQuote
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 30 years ago
Posts: 33273
Topic starter  

When I thought about putting this comparison together I was favoring the Imperial until I got to view the two side-by-side. Packard for me.

Gents, thanks for your responses!


John Bono
North Jersey


   
ReplyQuote
Share: