Poll: Which '64? (1...
 
Notifications
Clear all
Poll results: '64 Ford or Pontiac?
Voter(s): 25
Poll is closed Oct 29, 2025
'64 Ford  -  votes: 6 / 24%
6
24%
'64 Pontiac  -  votes: 17 / 68%
17
68%
Tie  -  votes: 2 / 8%
2
8%
Sorry, no interest in this selection.  -  votes: 0 / 0%
0
0%

Poll: Which '64? (10/16/2025)

26 Posts
16 Users
113 Reactions
811 Views
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 9626
Topic starter  

'64 Ford or Pontiac?

Be sure to make your selection.

Of course, please “Reply” to share your comments.

If selection is greater than 2 rank them.

 

Click on the picture to enlarge the image.

1964 Ford Galaxie 500 XL Convertible 16a
1964 Pontiac Catalina Convertiable 2b

John Bono
North Jersey


   
John Kuvakas, Steve Jacobs, David Green and 5 people reacted
Quote
Topic Tags
(@moe-parr)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 2345
 

The "Coke-bottle" body style makes Pontiac the easy winner for me today! 


Barry Levittan
Long Island, NY


   
John Kuvakas, Steve Jacobs, David Green and 4 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@car224)
Prominent Member
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 266
 

Tie. Two of my favorite cars for 1964. I like the Pontiac just a bit more.



   
John Kuvakas, Steve Jacobs, David Green and 4 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@perrone1)
Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 18719
 

I have always loved both of these cars!!

By a slim decision, I'm going Poncho!

GREAT comparo John!!



   
John Kuvakas, Steve Jacobs, John Napoli and 2 people reacted
ReplyQuote
Ed Glorius
(@ed-glorius)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 2601
 

I didn't even look at the photos before I voted for the Pontiac.


Retired in Dunedin, Florida.


   
John Kuvakas, Art Deco, Steve Jacobs and 4 people reacted
ReplyQuote
Brush
(@brush)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 2928
 

Hard to compare two different price point cars, the Pontiac is one place higher on the price point and thus should be a bit nicer. And it is.

Pontiac please.  



   
Steve Jacobs, David Green, John Napoli and 3 people reacted
ReplyQuote
Geno
 Geno
(@geno)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 5185
 

Although both are beautiful, you guys already know my answer. 😁



   
Steve Jacobs, John Napoli, Tony Perrone and 1 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@sizedoesmatter)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 9626
Topic starter  

Posted by: @sizedoesmatter

Posted by: @brush

Hard to compare two different price point cars, the Pontiac is one place higher on the price point and thus should be a bit nicer. And it is.

Pontiac please.  

 

Bruce, not too much difference in price points. 

1964 MSRP base price for a Ford Galaxy XL Convertible was $3,495

1964 MSRP base price for a Pontiac Catalina Convertible was $3,185 

The Pontiac is $310 less than the Ford.

 


John Bono
North Jersey


   
John Kuvakas, Steve Jacobs, Geno and 4 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@whodeytink)
Famed Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1519
 

Pontiac for the excellent styling.



   
John Kuvakas, Steve Jacobs, Geno and 3 people reacted
ReplyQuote
John Napoli
(@carsman1958)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 3978
 

Sorry guys, I went with the Ford, as the 64 was my favorite year.



   
John Kuvakas, Steve Jacobs, Geno and 2 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@jack-dodds)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 21334
 

I prefer the styling of the shoulder years of both these cars, although I still like them very much.  Having driven both of these cars I give the nod to the Pontiac for its superior styling and handling.



   
John Kuvakas, Steve Jacobs, Geno and 2 people reacted
ReplyQuote
David Green
(@david-green)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 9765
 

Like, Moe, I was taken with the coke bottle styling of the Pontiac. These two are closer in price Han I had thought. Thanks John.



   
John Kuvakas, Steve Jacobs, Geno and 2 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@bob-jackman)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 29 years ago
Posts: 15178
 

I've always thought the 64 Galaxy was a well designed car but the Pontiac's stacked headlights and distinctive grill treatment make it my choice.



   
John Kuvakas, Steve Jacobs, Geno and 2 people reacted
ReplyQuote
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7281
 

Posted by: @brush

Hard to compare two different price point cars, the Pontiac is one place higher on the price point and thus should be a bit nicer. And it is.

Pontiac please.  

I never consider price range when I'm looking at these "Which Ones?".  My eyes focus on the look and styling of the car.  The one that I'd like to own is dependent on that.  In the case of todays examples, both are very appealing and easy to like.  I've seen many expensive and some not so expensive that are Butt Ugly (to me) and I'd not want to be near it.  But yes, price does matter of course.  

 


George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
John Bono and Geno reacted
ReplyQuote
George Schire
(@georgeschire)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 7281
 

For '64, I really like both.  The Ford's styling and look had improved so much from the (in my opinion) unattractive '61s and the '64 is the last year I could even look at a full-size Ford.  The '65s were way to boxy looking for my taste. 

As for the Pontiac, it was a on a roll with it seemingly getting more pleasing looking every year since the really bland '60 version. 

So these thoughts shared, TODAY I vote for the PONTIAC!  But I'd take the keys to either in a heartbeat!


George Schire
Oakdale, Minnesota


   
ReplyQuote
Page 1 / 2
Share: